Difference between revisions of "Seuren2018a"
BurakTekin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Lucas M. Seuren; Mike Huiskes; Tom Koole; |Title=Resolving knowledge discrepancies in informing sequences |Tag(s)=EMCA; change-of-state...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
− | |Author(s)=Lucas M. Seuren; Mike Huiskes; Tom Koole; | + | |Author(s)=Lucas M. Seuren; Mike Huiskes; Tom Koole; |
|Title=Resolving knowledge discrepancies in informing sequences | |Title=Resolving knowledge discrepancies in informing sequences | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; change-of-state; action formation | |Tag(s)=EMCA; change-of-state; action formation | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=47 | |Volume=47 | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
− | |Pages= | + | |Pages=409–434 |
− | | | + | |URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/resolving-knowledge-discrepancies-in-informing-sequences/973452F32E8729A9BB6AA6F42B532FED |
+ | |DOI=10.1017/S0047404518000362 | ||
|Abstract=This article investigates a specific practice that recipients in Dutch talk-in-in- teraction use when responding to turns that have as one of their main jobs to inform. By responding to an informing turn with an oh-prefaced nonrepeating response that has yes/no-type interrogative word order, recipients treat that turn as counter to expectation and request both confirmation of the inference formulated in his/her response, as well as reconciliatory information for the two discrepant states of affairs. This practice is compared to similar cases where the nonrepeating response is not oh-prefaced to show that such turns implement different actions. Data are in Dutch with English translations. | |Abstract=This article investigates a specific practice that recipients in Dutch talk-in-in- teraction use when responding to turns that have as one of their main jobs to inform. By responding to an informing turn with an oh-prefaced nonrepeating response that has yes/no-type interrogative word order, recipients treat that turn as counter to expectation and request both confirmation of the inference formulated in his/her response, as well as reconciliatory information for the two discrepant states of affairs. This practice is compared to similar cases where the nonrepeating response is not oh-prefaced to show that such turns implement different actions. Data are in Dutch with English translations. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 01:57, 12 January 2020
Seuren2018a | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Seuren2018a |
Author(s) | Lucas M. Seuren, Mike Huiskes, Tom Koole |
Title | Resolving knowledge discrepancies in informing sequences |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, change-of-state, action formation |
Publisher | |
Year | 2018 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Language in Society |
Volume | 47 |
Number | 3 |
Pages | 409–434 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1017/S0047404518000362 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
This article investigates a specific practice that recipients in Dutch talk-in-in- teraction use when responding to turns that have as one of their main jobs to inform. By responding to an informing turn with an oh-prefaced nonrepeating response that has yes/no-type interrogative word order, recipients treat that turn as counter to expectation and request both confirmation of the inference formulated in his/her response, as well as reconciliatory information for the two discrepant states of affairs. This practice is compared to similar cases where the nonrepeating response is not oh-prefaced to show that such turns implement different actions. Data are in Dutch with English translations.
Notes