Difference between revisions of "Rae2001"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=John Rae; |Title=Ongoing participation in interaction: Doing participation framework |Tag(s)=EMCA; Participation; Participation framewo...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=John Rae; | + | |Author(s)=John Rae; |
| − | |Title=Ongoing participation in interaction: | + | |Title=Ongoing participation in interaction: doing participation framework |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Participation; Participation framework; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Participation; Participation framework; |
|Key=Rae2001 | |Key=Rae2001 | ||
|Year=2001 | |Year=2001 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
| − | |Journal=Research on Language | + | |Journal=Research on Language and Social Interaction |
|Volume=34 | |Volume=34 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Number=2 |
| + | |Pages=253–278 | ||
|URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/S15327973RLSI34-2_4 | |URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/S15327973RLSI34-2_4 | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1207/S15327973RLSI34-2_4 |
|Abstract=Goffman (1981) introduced the terms participation status and participation framework to differentiate how people involved in an interactional setting participate in that setting. In this article, I examine a particular work context in which participants in an interaction reorganize their participation such that, although remaining physically copresent, one of them makes or receives telephone calls to or from a non-copresent party. I show how this is a major site of body movement, including synchronous postural change (Kendon, 1990) before and after the call, and I examine the participants' vocal and nonvocal resources for entry into involvement with the phone call. Examination of these resources leads to a critical assessment of the concept of participation frameworks. | |Abstract=Goffman (1981) introduced the terms participation status and participation framework to differentiate how people involved in an interactional setting participate in that setting. In this article, I examine a particular work context in which participants in an interaction reorganize their participation such that, although remaining physically copresent, one of them makes or receives telephone calls to or from a non-copresent party. I show how this is a major site of body movement, including synchronous postural change (Kendon, 1990) before and after the call, and I examine the participants' vocal and nonvocal resources for entry into involvement with the phone call. Examination of these resources leads to a critical assessment of the concept of participation frameworks. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:08, 29 October 2019
| Rae2001 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Rae2001 |
| Author(s) | John Rae |
| Title | Ongoing participation in interaction: doing participation framework |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Participation, Participation framework |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2001 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Research on Language and Social Interaction |
| Volume | 34 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 253–278 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1207/S15327973RLSI34-2_4 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Goffman (1981) introduced the terms participation status and participation framework to differentiate how people involved in an interactional setting participate in that setting. In this article, I examine a particular work context in which participants in an interaction reorganize their participation such that, although remaining physically copresent, one of them makes or receives telephone calls to or from a non-copresent party. I show how this is a major site of body movement, including synchronous postural change (Kendon, 1990) before and after the call, and I examine the participants' vocal and nonvocal resources for entry into involvement with the phone call. Examination of these resources leads to a critical assessment of the concept of participation frameworks.
Notes
