Difference between revisions of "Laurier2018"
BogdanaHuma (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2018-05-18 08:26:02) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| − | | | + | |BibType=ARTICLE |
| − | | | + | |Author(s)=Eric Laurier; |
|Title=Some thoughts on the Conversational Rollercoaster | |Title=Some thoughts on the Conversational Rollercoaster | ||
| − | |||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Ethnomethodology; experience; public understanding of science; science fairs; transcription; conversational rollercoaster | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Ethnomethodology; experience; public understanding of science; science fairs; transcription; conversational rollercoaster | ||
| − | | | + | |Key=Laurier2018 |
|Year=2018 | |Year=2018 | ||
| + | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Discourse Studies | |Journal=Discourse Studies | ||
|Volume=20 | |Volume=20 | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=438–442 |
| − | |URL=https://doi | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461445618754582 |
|DOI=10.1177/1461445618754582 | |DOI=10.1177/1461445618754582 | ||
|Abstract=The commentary provides a series of notes on the article ‘The Conversational Rollercoaster: Conversation analysis and the public science of talk’. There are two broad areas that I attend to: one is on the formulation of the Conversational Rollercoaster in the light of the warrants of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis and the second is around what the Conversational Rollercoaster accomplished. | |Abstract=The commentary provides a series of notes on the article ‘The Conversational Rollercoaster: Conversation analysis and the public science of talk’. There are two broad areas that I attend to: one is on the formulation of the Conversational Rollercoaster in the light of the warrants of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis and the second is around what the Conversational Rollercoaster accomplished. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 04:16, 13 January 2020
| Laurier2018 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Laurier2018 |
| Author(s) | Eric Laurier |
| Title | Some thoughts on the Conversational Rollercoaster |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Ethnomethodology, experience, public understanding of science, science fairs, transcription, conversational rollercoaster |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2018 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 20 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 438–442 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445618754582 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The commentary provides a series of notes on the article ‘The Conversational Rollercoaster: Conversation analysis and the public science of talk’. There are two broad areas that I attend to: one is on the formulation of the Conversational Rollercoaster in the light of the warrants of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis and the second is around what the Conversational Rollercoaster accomplished.
Notes
