Difference between revisions of "Balaman-Sert2017"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "Conversation analysis;" to "Conversation Analysis;") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Ufuk Balaman; Olcay | + | |Author(s)=Ufuk Balaman; Olcay Sert; |
| − | |Title=The | + | |Title=The coordination of online L2 interaction and orientations to task interface for epistemic progression |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Online interaction; Epistemics; Coordination; Conversation Analysis; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Online interaction; Epistemics; Coordination; Conversation Analysis; |
|Key=Balaman-Sert2017 | |Key=Balaman-Sert2017 | ||
|Year=2017 | |Year=2017 | ||
| + | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | |Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | ||
|Volume=115 | |Volume=115 | ||
|Pages=115-129 | |Pages=115-129 | ||
| − | | | + | |URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378216617300942 |
| − | |Abstract=The | + | |DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.015 |
| − | as | + | |Abstract=The role of knowledge in social interaction has been a recent research concern across several fields and the emergence of epistemics as a concept to understand information exchanges has been facilitated mainly through conservation analytic investigations (Heritage, 2012a, Heritage, 2012b). Relative epistemic status of speakers (Heritage, 2012a) has appeared to be a layer in the multidimensional body of action and knowledge co-construction (Goodwin, 2013). Although the nature of knowledge exchange processes in mundane talk and learning settings has been described in a number of studies, such an understanding has been explored to a lesser extent in technology-mediated and online interactional environments. With this in mind, we draw on multimodal conversation analysis to describe online video-based interactions based on a single case analysis that represents a larger corpus of 70 h of screen recordings. The findings reveal the incorporation of online interaction, screen orientations, and knowledge co-construction for task accomplishment purposes. The participants coordinate their interactions with their orientations to the task interface to enact epistemic progression, which consequently turns the interface into a layer, a semiotic field, and a screen-based resource in the course of knowledge co-construction. The results have important implications for research on online interaction and epistemics as well as for an understanding of coordination of multiple actions in geographically dispersed settings. |
| − | 2012a, | ||
| − | knowledge | ||
| − | settings | ||
| − | and | ||
| − | interactions | ||
| − | incorporation | ||
| − | participants | ||
| − | turns | ||
| − | important | ||
| − | in geographically dispersed settings. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 03:39, 26 September 2023
| Balaman-Sert2017 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Balaman-Sert2017 |
| Author(s) | Ufuk Balaman, Olcay Sert |
| Title | The coordination of online L2 interaction and orientations to task interface for epistemic progression |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Online interaction, Epistemics, Coordination, Conversation Analysis |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2017 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
| Volume | 115 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 115-129 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.015 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The role of knowledge in social interaction has been a recent research concern across several fields and the emergence of epistemics as a concept to understand information exchanges has been facilitated mainly through conservation analytic investigations (Heritage, 2012a, Heritage, 2012b). Relative epistemic status of speakers (Heritage, 2012a) has appeared to be a layer in the multidimensional body of action and knowledge co-construction (Goodwin, 2013). Although the nature of knowledge exchange processes in mundane talk and learning settings has been described in a number of studies, such an understanding has been explored to a lesser extent in technology-mediated and online interactional environments. With this in mind, we draw on multimodal conversation analysis to describe online video-based interactions based on a single case analysis that represents a larger corpus of 70 h of screen recordings. The findings reveal the incorporation of online interaction, screen orientations, and knowledge co-construction for task accomplishment purposes. The participants coordinate their interactions with their orientations to the task interface to enact epistemic progression, which consequently turns the interface into a layer, a semiotic field, and a screen-based resource in the course of knowledge co-construction. The results have important implications for research on online interaction and epistemics as well as for an understanding of coordination of multiple actions in geographically dispersed settings.
Notes
