Difference between revisions of "Mason2016"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replace - "Conversation analysis" to "Conversation Analysis")
 
Line 6: Line 6:
 
|Key=Mason2016
 
|Key=Mason2016
 
|Year=2016
 
|Year=2016
|Month=may
+
|Language=English
|Journal=Language \& Communication
+
|Journal=Language & Communication
 
|Volume=48
 
|Volume=48
 
|Pages=79–87
 
|Pages=79–87
|URL=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0271530916000203
+
|URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0271530916000203
 
|DOI=10.1016/j.langcom.2016.03.001
 
|DOI=10.1016/j.langcom.2016.03.001
|Abstract=This paper examines from a conversation analysis perspective how police officers manage police-suspect exchanges during the ‘argumentation stage’ of police interrogation while using the accuser's police interview as a basis for formulating questions during the ‘preparatory stage’. Analyzing the audio recorded police interrogation of a suspect and the investigative interview of his accuser, this paper shows how the ‘preparatory stage’ of police interrogation plays a key role in constructing the discourse themes of confrontation and self-interest that seem to shape police-suspect exchanges in United States custodial settings. The results of the paper suggest that police officers often use turn-taking and topic management strategies, such as those embedded in the popular Reid method of interrogation, to pressure the suspect into cooperating with the police
+
|Abstract=This paper examines from a conversation analysis perspective how police officers manage police-suspect exchanges during the ‘argumentation stage’ of police interrogation while using the accuser's police interview as a basis for formulating questions during the ‘preparatory stage’. Analyzing the audio recorded police interrogation of a suspect and the investigative interview of his accuser, this paper shows how the ‘preparatory stage’ of police interrogation plays a key role in constructing the discourse themes of confrontation and self-interest that seem to shape police-suspect exchanges in United States custodial settings. The results of the paper suggest that police officers often use turn-taking and topic management strategies, such as those embedded in the popular Reid method of interrogation, to pressure the suspect into cooperating with the police.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 08:28, 17 December 2019

Mason2016
BibType ARTICLE
Key Mason2016
Author(s) Marianne Mason
Title The ‘preparatory’ and ‘argumentation’ stages of police interrogation: A linguistic analysis of a criminal investigation
Editor(s)
Tag(s) Conversation Analysis, EMCA, Police interrogation, Police-suspect exchanges, Reid method, Argumentation stage, Preparatory stage
Publisher
Year 2016
Language English
City
Month
Journal Language & Communication
Volume 48
Number
Pages 79–87
URL Link
DOI 10.1016/j.langcom.2016.03.001
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This paper examines from a conversation analysis perspective how police officers manage police-suspect exchanges during the ‘argumentation stage’ of police interrogation while using the accuser's police interview as a basis for formulating questions during the ‘preparatory stage’. Analyzing the audio recorded police interrogation of a suspect and the investigative interview of his accuser, this paper shows how the ‘preparatory stage’ of police interrogation plays a key role in constructing the discourse themes of confrontation and self-interest that seem to shape police-suspect exchanges in United States custodial settings. The results of the paper suggest that police officers often use turn-taking and topic management strategies, such as those embedded in the popular Reid method of interrogation, to pressure the suspect into cooperating with the police.

Notes