Difference between revisions of "Mondada2018"
m |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=INCOLLECTION | |BibType=INCOLLECTION | ||
|Author(s)=Lorenza Mondada; | |Author(s)=Lorenza Mondada; | ||
| − | |Title=Controversial | + | |Title=Controversial issues in participatory urban planning: an ethnomethodological and conversation analytic historical study |
|Editor(s)=Simona Pekarek Doehler; Johannes Wagner; Esther González-Martínez; | |Editor(s)=Simona Pekarek Doehler; Johannes Wagner; Esther González-Martínez; | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Longitudinal Study; Political communication; | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Longitudinal Study; Political communication; | ||
|Key=Mondada2018 | |Key=Mondada2018 | ||
| + | |Publisher=Palgrave Macmillan | ||
|Year=2018 | |Year=2018 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
| + | |Address=London | ||
|Booktitle=Longitudinal Studies on the Organization of Social Interaction | |Booktitle=Longitudinal Studies on the Organization of Social Interaction | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=287–328 |
|URL=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/978-1-137-57007-9_10 | |URL=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/978-1-137-57007-9_10 | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1057/978-1-137-57007-9_10 |
|Abstract=This chapter contributes to a longitudinal and historical ethnomethodological and conversation analytic (EMCA) approach to interactional phenomena as they evolve across time by studying long-term controversies within an urban participatory project. On the basis of a unique video corpus documenting a grassroots political project over six years, the chapter not only shows how it is possible to follow discussions among participants in the long run—by focusing on specific actions through time—but also demonstrates how the participants themselves progressively build the history of the project, by focusing on members’ perspectives on history in the making. The issue is to produce an account of history as a locally situated achievement built and oriented to as such by members, within an emic praxeological and interactional perspective. | |Abstract=This chapter contributes to a longitudinal and historical ethnomethodological and conversation analytic (EMCA) approach to interactional phenomena as they evolve across time by studying long-term controversies within an urban participatory project. On the basis of a unique video corpus documenting a grassroots political project over six years, the chapter not only shows how it is possible to follow discussions among participants in the long run—by focusing on specific actions through time—but also demonstrates how the participants themselves progressively build the history of the project, by focusing on members’ perspectives on history in the making. The issue is to produce an account of history as a locally situated achievement built and oriented to as such by members, within an emic praxeological and interactional perspective. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:45, 13 January 2020
| Mondada2018 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Mondada2018 |
| Author(s) | Lorenza Mondada |
| Title | Controversial issues in participatory urban planning: an ethnomethodological and conversation analytic historical study |
| Editor(s) | Simona Pekarek Doehler, Johannes Wagner, Esther González-Martínez |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Longitudinal Study, Political communication |
| Publisher | Palgrave Macmillan |
| Year | 2018 |
| Language | English |
| City | London |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 287–328 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1057/978-1-137-57007-9_10 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Longitudinal Studies on the Organization of Social Interaction |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This chapter contributes to a longitudinal and historical ethnomethodological and conversation analytic (EMCA) approach to interactional phenomena as they evolve across time by studying long-term controversies within an urban participatory project. On the basis of a unique video corpus documenting a grassroots political project over six years, the chapter not only shows how it is possible to follow discussions among participants in the long run—by focusing on specific actions through time—but also demonstrates how the participants themselves progressively build the history of the project, by focusing on members’ perspectives on history in the making. The issue is to produce an account of history as a locally situated achievement built and oriented to as such by members, within an emic praxeological and interactional perspective.
Notes
