Difference between revisions of "Black2008"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Steven P. Black |Title=Creativity and Learning Jazz: The Practice of “Listening” |Tag(s)=EMCA; Music; Music pedagogy; Jazz; Listenin...")
 
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Author(s)=Steven P. Black
 
|Author(s)=Steven P. Black
|Title=Creativity and Learning Jazz: The Practice of “Listening”
+
|Title=Creativity and learning jazz: the practice of “listening”
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Music; Music pedagogy; Jazz; Listening; Creativity; Linguistic Anthropology;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Music; Music pedagogy; Jazz; Listening; Creativity; Linguistic Anthropology;
 
|Key=Black2008
 
|Key=Black2008
 
|Year=2008
 
|Year=2008
Line 10: Line 10:
 
|Volume=15
 
|Volume=15
 
|Number=2
 
|Number=2
|Pages=279-295
+
|Pages=279–295
 +
|URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10749030802391039
 
|DOI=10.1080/10749030802391039
 
|DOI=10.1080/10749030802391039
|Abstract=This article is about interaction, culture, and creativity. The ethnographic setting is a set of jazz performance classes at a California university. Although I write about jazz music, the reader need not have a background in studying or performing jazz (or music in general) to understand this article. In the title of the article, the term “practice” refers to (1) “listening” as a culturally specific communicative practice, and (2) the practice (a.k.a. rehearsal) of that culturally specific version of “listening”. I document and analyze how jazz instructors communicate with students about group interplay during
+
|Abstract=This article is about interaction, culture, and creativity. The ethnographic setting is a set of jazz performance classes at a California university. Although I write about jazz music, the reader need not have a background in studying or performing jazz (or music in general) to understand this article. In the title of the article, the term “practice” refers to (1) “listening” as a culturally specific communicative practice, and (2) the practice (a.k.a. rehearsal) of that culturally specific version of “listening”. I document and analyze how jazz instructors communicate with students about group interplay during musical performance. Extrapolating from this focus, I suggest some ways that contemporary linguistic anthropology can contribute to theories of creativity, focusing on the role that cultural norms of interaction defined by a particular activity play in constraining or shaping creative processes.
musical performance. Extrapolating from this focus, I suggest some ways that contemporary linguistic anthropology can contribute to theories of creativity, focusing on the role that cultural norms of interaction defined by a particular activity play in constraining or shaping creative processes.
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 00:30, 21 November 2019

Black2008
BibType ARTICLE
Key Black2008
Author(s) Steven P. Black
Title Creativity and learning jazz: the practice of “listening”
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Music, Music pedagogy, Jazz, Listening, Creativity, Linguistic Anthropology
Publisher
Year 2008
Language English
City
Month
Journal Mind, Culture & Activity
Volume 15
Number 2
Pages 279–295
URL Link
DOI 10.1080/10749030802391039
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This article is about interaction, culture, and creativity. The ethnographic setting is a set of jazz performance classes at a California university. Although I write about jazz music, the reader need not have a background in studying or performing jazz (or music in general) to understand this article. In the title of the article, the term “practice” refers to (1) “listening” as a culturally specific communicative practice, and (2) the practice (a.k.a. rehearsal) of that culturally specific version of “listening”. I document and analyze how jazz instructors communicate with students about group interplay during musical performance. Extrapolating from this focus, I suggest some ways that contemporary linguistic anthropology can contribute to theories of creativity, focusing on the role that cultural norms of interaction defined by a particular activity play in constraining or shaping creative processes.

Notes