Difference between revisions of "Gardner2007"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=36 | |Volume=36 | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=319–341 |
| − | |URL= | + | |URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/right-connections-acknowledging-epistemic-progression-in-talk/4C0B55D3139CA287CB2AC66C531A0355 |
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1017/S0047404507070169 |
|Abstract=It is proposed that the response token Right, in one important use, is a marker of epistemic dependency between two units of talk by a prior speaker, and that this talk has progressed the understanding by the Right producer of a complex activity involving much information transfer. Two other Rights as response tokens are considered: as an epistemic confirmation token similar to That's right, and as a change-of-activity token similar to Alright/Okay. In addition, Right is shown to be different from other response tokens, including the news receipt Oh, newsmarkers such as Really?, and continuers and acknowledgment tokens such as Mm hm and Yeah. The primary data consist of a fully transcribed dietetic consultation in an Australian hospital between a dietician and a client. 1 | |Abstract=It is proposed that the response token Right, in one important use, is a marker of epistemic dependency between two units of talk by a prior speaker, and that this talk has progressed the understanding by the Right producer of a complex activity involving much information transfer. Two other Rights as response tokens are considered: as an epistemic confirmation token similar to That's right, and as a change-of-activity token similar to Alright/Okay. In addition, Right is shown to be different from other response tokens, including the news receipt Oh, newsmarkers such as Really?, and continuers and acknowledgment tokens such as Mm hm and Yeah. The primary data consist of a fully transcribed dietetic consultation in an Australian hospital between a dietician and a client. 1 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 08:10, 19 November 2019
| Gardner2007 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Gardner2007 |
| Author(s) | Rod Gardner |
| Title | The right connections: Acknowledging epistemic progression in talk |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Response tokens, listener, talk-in-interaction, epistemic token, medical discourse |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2007 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Language in Society |
| Volume | 36 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 319–341 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0047404507070169 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
It is proposed that the response token Right, in one important use, is a marker of epistemic dependency between two units of talk by a prior speaker, and that this talk has progressed the understanding by the Right producer of a complex activity involving much information transfer. Two other Rights as response tokens are considered: as an epistemic confirmation token similar to That's right, and as a change-of-activity token similar to Alright/Okay. In addition, Right is shown to be different from other response tokens, including the news receipt Oh, newsmarkers such as Really?, and continuers and acknowledgment tokens such as Mm hm and Yeah. The primary data consist of a fully transcribed dietetic consultation in an Australian hospital between a dietician and a client. 1
Notes
