Difference between revisions of "Freed-Greenwood1096"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Alice F. Freed;Alice Greenwood; |Title=Women, Men, and Type of Talk: What Makes the Difference? |Tag(s)=EMCA; Gender; questions; tag q...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
− | |Author(s)=Alice F. Freed;Alice Greenwood; | + | |Author(s)=Alice F. Freed; Alice Greenwood; |
− | |Title=Women, | + | |Title=Women, men, and type of talk: what makes the difference? |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Gender; questions; tag questions; discourse analysis; conversation analysis; | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Gender; questions; tag questions; discourse analysis; conversation analysis; | ||
|Key=Freed-Greenwood1096 | |Key=Freed-Greenwood1096 | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=25 | |Volume=25 | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
− | |Pages= | + | |Pages=1–26 |
− | |URL= | + | |URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/women-men-and-type-of-talk-what-makes-the-difference/AC60B0C958EE78C5F0C01241896DD065 |
− | |Abstract=In a study of | + | |DOI=10.1017/S0047404500020418 |
− | pairs of | + | |Abstract=In a study of dyadic conversations between four female and four male pairs of friends, the use of the phrase you know and questions are examined within three types of discourse. Women and men are found to use these features with equal frequency; and all speakers, regardless of sex or gender, use them in comparable ways. Although these particular discourse features have been previously associated with a female speech style, the results of this study show that it is the particular requirements associated with the three types of talk that motivate their use, and not the sex or gender of the individual speaker. The problems of generalizing about the characteristics of female or male speech, outside of a particular conversational context, are discussed; and it is shown that a gendered style cannot be adequately defined by counting individual speech variables removed from the specifics of the talk context. |
− | |||
− | these features with equal frequency; and all speakers, regardless of | ||
− | or gender, use them in comparable ways. Although these particular | ||
− | |||
− | style, the results of this study show that it is the particular | ||
− | associated with the three types of | ||
− | the sex or gender | ||
− | about the characteristics of | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | variables | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 13:43, 24 October 2019
Freed-Greenwood1096 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Freed-Greenwood1096 |
Author(s) | Alice F. Freed, Alice Greenwood |
Title | Women, men, and type of talk: what makes the difference? |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Gender, questions, tag questions, discourse analysis, conversation analysis |
Publisher | |
Year | 1996 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Language in Society |
Volume | 25 |
Number | 1 |
Pages | 1–26 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1017/S0047404500020418 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
In a study of dyadic conversations between four female and four male pairs of friends, the use of the phrase you know and questions are examined within three types of discourse. Women and men are found to use these features with equal frequency; and all speakers, regardless of sex or gender, use them in comparable ways. Although these particular discourse features have been previously associated with a female speech style, the results of this study show that it is the particular requirements associated with the three types of talk that motivate their use, and not the sex or gender of the individual speaker. The problems of generalizing about the characteristics of female or male speech, outside of a particular conversational context, are discussed; and it is shown that a gendered style cannot be adequately defined by counting individual speech variables removed from the specifics of the talk context.
Notes