Difference between revisions of "Park2010"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Innhwa Park; |Title=Making an impasse: The use of anyways as a sequence-closing device |Tag(s)=EMCA; Telephone; Closings; Sequence orga...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Innhwa Park; | + | |Author(s)=Innhwa Park; |
|Title=Making an impasse: The use of anyways as a sequence-closing device | |Title=Making an impasse: The use of anyways as a sequence-closing device | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Telephone; Closings; Sequence organization; Conversation Analysis; Anyways; Discourse Markers; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Telephone; Closings; Sequence organization; Conversation Analysis; Anyways; Discourse Markers; |
|Key=Park2010 | |Key=Park2010 | ||
|Year=2010 | |Year=2010 | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=42 | |Volume=42 | ||
|Number=12 | |Number=12 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=3283–3299 |
|URL=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216610001748 | |URL=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216610001748 | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.002 |
|Abstract=Based on a conversation analytic study of ordinary telephone conversations, the paper examines the use of anyway as a sequence-closing device in context in which the participants face an interactional impasse. The study suggests that the closure-relevant anyway, both as a stand-alone turn constructional unit (TCU) and a TCU initial component, has distinctive features. In contrast to ordinary methods of maintaining conversational coherence, the use of anyway is designed to indicate an impending break in contiguity. Further, the closure-relevant anyway is often produced in a dispreferred environment in which the participants are not in alignment. The ways the participants deploy anyway as a sequence-closing device to put an end to such interactional trouble, including a break in contiguity and misalignment, are discussed in detail. | |Abstract=Based on a conversation analytic study of ordinary telephone conversations, the paper examines the use of anyway as a sequence-closing device in context in which the participants face an interactional impasse. The study suggests that the closure-relevant anyway, both as a stand-alone turn constructional unit (TCU) and a TCU initial component, has distinctive features. In contrast to ordinary methods of maintaining conversational coherence, the use of anyway is designed to indicate an impending break in contiguity. Further, the closure-relevant anyway is often produced in a dispreferred environment in which the participants are not in alignment. The ways the participants deploy anyway as a sequence-closing device to put an end to such interactional trouble, including a break in contiguity and misalignment, are discussed in detail. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 07:26, 25 November 2019
| Park2010 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Park2010 |
| Author(s) | Innhwa Park |
| Title | Making an impasse: The use of anyways as a sequence-closing device |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Telephone, Closings, Sequence organization, Conversation Analysis, Anyways, Discourse Markers |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2010 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
| Volume | 42 |
| Number | 12 |
| Pages | 3283–3299 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.002 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Based on a conversation analytic study of ordinary telephone conversations, the paper examines the use of anyway as a sequence-closing device in context in which the participants face an interactional impasse. The study suggests that the closure-relevant anyway, both as a stand-alone turn constructional unit (TCU) and a TCU initial component, has distinctive features. In contrast to ordinary methods of maintaining conversational coherence, the use of anyway is designed to indicate an impending break in contiguity. Further, the closure-relevant anyway is often produced in a dispreferred environment in which the participants are not in alignment. The ways the participants deploy anyway as a sequence-closing device to put an end to such interactional trouble, including a break in contiguity and misalignment, are discussed in detail.
Notes
