Difference between revisions of "Havlik2007"
JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Martin Havlík; |Title=‘Slušný’ Bursík a ‘neslušný’ Železný v Otázkách Václava Moravce |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Anal...") |
JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Martin Havlík; | |Author(s)=Martin Havlík; | ||
|Title=‘Slušný’ Bursík a ‘neslušný’ Železný v Otázkách Václava Moravce | |Title=‘Slušný’ Bursík a ‘neslušný’ Železný v Otázkách Václava Moravce | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Turn-taking; Morality; TV; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Turn-taking; Morality; TV; |
|Key=Havlik2007 | |Key=Havlik2007 | ||
|Year=2007 | |Year=2007 | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Number=43-44 | |Number=43-44 | ||
|Pages=33-68 | |Pages=33-68 | ||
| − | |Abstract=Participating in a TV political debate not only offers the opportunity to present information, opinions etc., but it also gives the participants a chance to present themselves and others. Such a self- and other-presentation is firmly based on the social norms and moral order of a society. We can, therefore, understand what is going on in TV debates (or in any talk-in-interaction) only because we are familiar with such norms and order. However, this familiarity might not be conscious knowledge. Hence a detailed description of a TV debate (or any talk-in-interaction, or, in fact, any Member’s interaction) can help us to gain a better understanding of the norms and moral order in our society. Describing communicative practices of two politicians involved in one particular TV debate by means of ethnomethodological conversation analysis, I point out just how their self- and other-presentation is rooted in our moral order and social norms including the norms of the TV debate and in which particular ones. | + | |Abstract='Fair' Bursík and 'unfair' Železný in Questions of Václav Moravec |
| + | |||
| + | Participating in a TV political debate not only offers the opportunity to present information, opinions etc., but it also gives the participants a chance to present themselves and others. Such a self- and other-presentation is firmly based on the social norms and moral order of a society. We can, therefore, understand what is going on in TV debates (or in any talk-in-interaction) only because we are familiar with such norms and order. However, this familiarity might not be conscious knowledge. Hence a detailed description of a TV debate (or any talk-in-interaction, or, in fact, any Member’s interaction) can help us to gain a better understanding of the norms and moral order in our society. Describing communicative practices of two politicians involved in one particular TV debate by means of ethnomethodological conversation analysis, I point out just how their self- and other-presentation is rooted in our moral order and social norms including the norms of the TV debate and in which particular ones. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 02:52, 5 October 2017
| Havlik2007 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Havlik2007 |
| Author(s) | Martin Havlík |
| Title | ‘Slušný’ Bursík a ‘neslušný’ Železný v Otázkách Václava Moravce |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Turn-taking, Morality, TV |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2007 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Biograf |
| Volume | |
| Number | 43-44 |
| Pages | 33-68 |
| URL | |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
'Fair' Bursík and 'unfair' Železný in Questions of Václav Moravec
Participating in a TV political debate not only offers the opportunity to present information, opinions etc., but it also gives the participants a chance to present themselves and others. Such a self- and other-presentation is firmly based on the social norms and moral order of a society. We can, therefore, understand what is going on in TV debates (or in any talk-in-interaction) only because we are familiar with such norms and order. However, this familiarity might not be conscious knowledge. Hence a detailed description of a TV debate (or any talk-in-interaction, or, in fact, any Member’s interaction) can help us to gain a better understanding of the norms and moral order in our society. Describing communicative practices of two politicians involved in one particular TV debate by means of ethnomethodological conversation analysis, I point out just how their self- and other-presentation is rooted in our moral order and social norms including the norms of the TV debate and in which particular ones.
Notes
