Difference between revisions of "Wowk2004"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Maria T. Wowk; Andrew Carlin; |Title=Depicting a Liminal Position in Ethnomethodology, Conversation Analysis and Membership Categorizat...") |
m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
− | |Author(s)=Maria T. Wowk; Andrew Carlin; | + | |Author(s)=Maria T. Wowk; Andrew Carlin; |
|Title=Depicting a Liminal Position in Ethnomethodology, Conversation Analysis and Membership Categorization Analysis: The Work of Rod Watson | |Title=Depicting a Liminal Position in Ethnomethodology, Conversation Analysis and Membership Categorization Analysis: The Work of Rod Watson | ||
− | |Tag(s)=Membership Categorization Analysis; EMCA; Institutional talk; Ethnomethodology; Public Space; | + | |Tag(s)=Membership Categorization Analysis; EMCA; Institutional talk; Ethnomethodology; Public Space; |
|Key=Wowk2004 | |Key=Wowk2004 | ||
|Year=2004 | |Year=2004 | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
|Pages=69-89 | |Pages=69-89 | ||
− | | | + | |URL=https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HUMA.0000012245.95451.4b |
+ | |DOI=10.1023/B:HUMA.0000012245.95451.4b | ||
|Abstract=This paper provides a provisional examination of Rod Watson's work and contributions to EM/CA/MCA, in part through a critique of misrepresentations of his arguments in secondary accounts of his work. The form of these misrepresentations includes adumbration and traducement of his arguments. Focusing on the reflexivity of category and sequence and turn-generated categories, we suggest that his analytic position within ethnomethodological fields is unique and remarkable, yet largely unacknowledged. We argue that a re-examination of the body of Watson's work makes relevant explicit and appropriate acknowledgement of his contributions through his “unconventional” approach and his extension of prior works in novel and stimulating directions. | |Abstract=This paper provides a provisional examination of Rod Watson's work and contributions to EM/CA/MCA, in part through a critique of misrepresentations of his arguments in secondary accounts of his work. The form of these misrepresentations includes adumbration and traducement of his arguments. Focusing on the reflexivity of category and sequence and turn-generated categories, we suggest that his analytic position within ethnomethodological fields is unique and remarkable, yet largely unacknowledged. We argue that a re-examination of the body of Watson's work makes relevant explicit and appropriate acknowledgement of his contributions through his “unconventional” approach and his extension of prior works in novel and stimulating directions. | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 01:48, 4 October 2017
Wowk2004 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Wowk2004 |
Author(s) | Maria T. Wowk, Andrew Carlin |
Title | Depicting a Liminal Position in Ethnomethodology, Conversation Analysis and Membership Categorization Analysis: The Work of Rod Watson |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | Membership Categorization Analysis, EMCA, Institutional talk, Ethnomethodology, Public Space |
Publisher | |
Year | 2004 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Human Studies |
Volume | 27 |
Number | 1 |
Pages | 69-89 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1023/B:HUMA.0000012245.95451.4b |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
This paper provides a provisional examination of Rod Watson's work and contributions to EM/CA/MCA, in part through a critique of misrepresentations of his arguments in secondary accounts of his work. The form of these misrepresentations includes adumbration and traducement of his arguments. Focusing on the reflexivity of category and sequence and turn-generated categories, we suggest that his analytic position within ethnomethodological fields is unique and remarkable, yet largely unacknowledged. We argue that a re-examination of the body of Watson's work makes relevant explicit and appropriate acknowledgement of his contributions through his “unconventional” approach and his extension of prior works in novel and stimulating directions.
Notes