Difference between revisions of "Murphy2004"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Keith M. Murphy; |Title=Imagination as joint activity: The case of architectural interaction |Tag(s)=EMCA; Discourse Analysis; Gesture;...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
− | |Author(s)=Keith M. Murphy; | + | |Author(s)=Keith M. Murphy; |
− | |Title=Imagination as joint activity: | + | |Title=Imagination as joint activity: the case of architectural interaction |
− | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Discourse Analysis; Gesture; Imagination; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Discourse Analysis; Gesture; Imagination; |
|Key=Murphy2004 | |Key=Murphy2004 | ||
|Year=2004 | |Year=2004 | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Volume=11 | |Volume=11 | ||
|Number=4 | |Number=4 | ||
− | |Pages= | + | |Pages=267–278 |
|URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s15327884mca1104_3 | |URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s15327884mca1104_3 | ||
− | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1207/s15327884mca1104_3 |
|Abstract=This article draws from the insights offered by discourse analysis and the study of gesture to examine imagination as a product of, and resource for, social action. Using data collected during ethnographic fieldwork at an architecture firm, the article explores how imagining can emerge from a group of interactants who use many semiotic media, including talk, gestures, and drawings, to imagine something together. Following the groundwork laid by Benedict Spinoza, this perspective moves the "object" of imagination out of the brain, away from mental imagery and into the space in which shared activities take place. Such a move has implications for rethinking imagination in terms of communicative interaction and social activity. | |Abstract=This article draws from the insights offered by discourse analysis and the study of gesture to examine imagination as a product of, and resource for, social action. Using data collected during ethnographic fieldwork at an architecture firm, the article explores how imagining can emerge from a group of interactants who use many semiotic media, including talk, gestures, and drawings, to imagine something together. Following the groundwork laid by Benedict Spinoza, this perspective moves the "object" of imagination out of the brain, away from mental imagery and into the space in which shared activities take place. Such a move has implications for rethinking imagination in terms of communicative interaction and social activity. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 01:00, 1 November 2019
Murphy2004 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Murphy2004 |
Author(s) | Keith M. Murphy |
Title | Imagination as joint activity: the case of architectural interaction |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Discourse Analysis, Gesture, Imagination |
Publisher | |
Year | 2004 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Mind, Culture & Activity |
Volume | 11 |
Number | 4 |
Pages | 267–278 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1207/s15327884mca1104_3 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
This article draws from the insights offered by discourse analysis and the study of gesture to examine imagination as a product of, and resource for, social action. Using data collected during ethnographic fieldwork at an architecture firm, the article explores how imagining can emerge from a group of interactants who use many semiotic media, including talk, gestures, and drawings, to imagine something together. Following the groundwork laid by Benedict Spinoza, this perspective moves the "object" of imagination out of the brain, away from mental imagery and into the space in which shared activities take place. Such a move has implications for rethinking imagination in terms of communicative interaction and social activity.
Notes