Difference between revisions of "Walker2010"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Address=Amsterdam / Philadelphia | |Address=Amsterdam / Philadelphia | ||
|Booktitle=Prosody in Interaction | |Booktitle=Prosody in Interaction | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=51–72 |
| + | |URL=https://benjamins.com/catalog/sidag.23.08wal | ||
|DOI=10.1075/sidag.23.08wal | |DOI=10.1075/sidag.23.08wal | ||
| − | |Note= | + | |Note=See: Günthner, Susanne (2010) ‘Rush-throughs as social action: Comments on Gareth Walker “The phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice: Rush-throughs in English talk-in-interaction”’. In: Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, Margret Selting, eds. (2010) Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 73–80 |
|Abstract=There is a need to get to grips with the phonetic design of talk in its totality and without a separation of prosodic and non-prosodic aspects. Features of duration, phonation and articulation are all shown to be systematic features of rush-throughs, and bound up with the turn-holding function of the practice. Data are drawn from audio and video recordings made in a range of interactional settings, all involving speakers of English from the UK or the US. The paper concludes by reviewing some of the reasons why this holistic approach is desirable, namely: empirical findings, the parametric nature of speech, and a commitment to a mode of enquiry which takes seriously observable details of all kinds. | |Abstract=There is a need to get to grips with the phonetic design of talk in its totality and without a separation of prosodic and non-prosodic aspects. Features of duration, phonation and articulation are all shown to be systematic features of rush-throughs, and bound up with the turn-holding function of the practice. Data are drawn from audio and video recordings made in a range of interactional settings, all involving speakers of English from the UK or the US. The paper concludes by reviewing some of the reasons why this holistic approach is desirable, namely: empirical findings, the parametric nature of speech, and a commitment to a mode of enquiry which takes seriously observable details of all kinds. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 12:35, 24 November 2019
| Walker2010 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Walker2010 |
| Author(s) | Gareth Walker |
| Title | The phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice: Rush-throughs in English talk-in-interaction |
| Editor(s) | Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, Margret Selting |
| Tag(s) | Interactional Linguistics, Phonetics, rush-throughs |
| Publisher | John Benjamins |
| Year | 2010 |
| Language | |
| City | Amsterdam / Philadelphia |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 51–72 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1075/sidag.23.08wal |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Prosody in Interaction |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
There is a need to get to grips with the phonetic design of talk in its totality and without a separation of prosodic and non-prosodic aspects. Features of duration, phonation and articulation are all shown to be systematic features of rush-throughs, and bound up with the turn-holding function of the practice. Data are drawn from audio and video recordings made in a range of interactional settings, all involving speakers of English from the UK or the US. The paper concludes by reviewing some of the reasons why this holistic approach is desirable, namely: empirical findings, the parametric nature of speech, and a commitment to a mode of enquiry which takes seriously observable details of all kinds.
Notes
See: Günthner, Susanne (2010) ‘Rush-throughs as social action: Comments on Gareth Walker “The phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice: Rush-throughs in English talk-in-interaction”’. In: Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, Margret Selting, eds. (2010) Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 73–80
