Difference between revisions of "Lynch1999"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Michael Lynch; |Title=Archives in formation: Privileged spaces, popular archives, and paper trails |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Arch...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Michael Lynch; | + | |Author(s)=Michael Lynch; |
|Title=Archives in formation: Privileged spaces, popular archives, and paper trails | |Title=Archives in formation: Privileged spaces, popular archives, and paper trails | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Archives | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Archives | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|Year=1999 | |Year=1999 | ||
|Journal=History of the Human Sciences | |Journal=History of the Human Sciences | ||
| − | |Volume= | + | |Volume=12 |
| − | |Pages= | + | |Number=2 |
| + | |Pages=65–87 | ||
|URL=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/09526959922120252 | |URL=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/09526959922120252 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1177/09526959922120252 | ||
|Abstract=The article begins with Derrida’s etymology of the word ‘archive’: a privileged site to which records are officially consigned and in which they are guarded by legal authority. It explores contemporary variations on the theme of archive. The cases presented include efforts to construct scholarly archives that stand as personal monuments, struggles over the collection and consignment of records during official investigations of government scandals, and the ‘popular archive’ produced by the media spectacle surrounding the O. J. Simpson trial. The discussion orients to these archives not only as sources of documentary information but also as sites of historical struggle over the writing, collection, consignment, destruction and interpretation of writings. | |Abstract=The article begins with Derrida’s etymology of the word ‘archive’: a privileged site to which records are officially consigned and in which they are guarded by legal authority. It explores contemporary variations on the theme of archive. The cases presented include efforts to construct scholarly archives that stand as personal monuments, struggles over the collection and consignment of records during official investigations of government scandals, and the ‘popular archive’ produced by the media spectacle surrounding the O. J. Simpson trial. The discussion orients to these archives not only as sources of documentary information but also as sites of historical struggle over the writing, collection, consignment, destruction and interpretation of writings. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:37, 19 October 2019
| Lynch1999 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Lynch1999 |
| Author(s) | Michael Lynch |
| Title | Archives in formation: Privileged spaces, popular archives, and paper trails |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Ethnomethodology, Archives |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1999 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | History of the Human Sciences |
| Volume | 12 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 65–87 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/09526959922120252 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The article begins with Derrida’s etymology of the word ‘archive’: a privileged site to which records are officially consigned and in which they are guarded by legal authority. It explores contemporary variations on the theme of archive. The cases presented include efforts to construct scholarly archives that stand as personal monuments, struggles over the collection and consignment of records during official investigations of government scandals, and the ‘popular archive’ produced by the media spectacle surrounding the O. J. Simpson trial. The discussion orients to these archives not only as sources of documentary information but also as sites of historical struggle over the writing, collection, consignment, destruction and interpretation of writings.
Notes
