Difference between revisions of "Livingston2008a"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Eric Livingston; |Title=Context and details in studies of the witnessable social order: Puzzles, maps, checkers, and geometry |Tag(s)=E...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Eric Livingston; | + | |Author(s)=Eric Livingston; |
|Title=Context and details in studies of the witnessable social order: Puzzles, maps, checkers, and geometry | |Title=Context and details in studies of the witnessable social order: Puzzles, maps, checkers, and geometry | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Context; Research Methods; Thematics; Reasoning | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Context; Research Methods; Thematics; Reasoning | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Volume=40 | |Volume=40 | ||
|Number=5 | |Number=5 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=840–862 |
|URL=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037821660800009X | |URL=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037821660800009X | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2007.09.009 |
|Abstract=“Context” is typically treated as a resource for the analysis of interactional settings. In this paper, the specification and characterization of context itself, in and as situated action and reasoning, are seen as a focal point of research. The paper is framed by practical and theoretical problems currently facing ethnomethodology. It then discusses organizational thematics, situated analytics, and new research directions, particularly in the study of natural logics endemic to domains of expertise. The methodological and substantive findings of the paper are summarized in terms of the development of new sociologies of a witnessable, as opposed to a hidden, social order. | |Abstract=“Context” is typically treated as a resource for the analysis of interactional settings. In this paper, the specification and characterization of context itself, in and as situated action and reasoning, are seen as a focal point of research. The paper is framed by practical and theoretical problems currently facing ethnomethodology. It then discusses organizational thematics, situated analytics, and new research directions, particularly in the study of natural logics endemic to domains of expertise. The methodological and substantive findings of the paper are summarized in terms of the development of new sociologies of a witnessable, as opposed to a hidden, social order. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 12:01, 20 November 2019
| Livingston2008a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Livingston2008a |
| Author(s) | Eric Livingston |
| Title | Context and details in studies of the witnessable social order: Puzzles, maps, checkers, and geometry |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Ethnomethodology, Context, Research Methods, Thematics, Reasoning |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2008 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
| Volume | 40 |
| Number | 5 |
| Pages | 840–862 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.09.009 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
“Context” is typically treated as a resource for the analysis of interactional settings. In this paper, the specification and characterization of context itself, in and as situated action and reasoning, are seen as a focal point of research. The paper is framed by practical and theoretical problems currently facing ethnomethodology. It then discusses organizational thematics, situated analytics, and new research directions, particularly in the study of natural logics endemic to domains of expertise. The methodological and substantive findings of the paper are summarized in terms of the development of new sociologies of a witnessable, as opposed to a hidden, social order.
Notes
