Difference between revisions of "Kendrick2017"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Kobin H. Kendrick; |Title=Using Conversation Analysis in the Lab |Tag(s)=EMCA; Laboratories; Conversation Analysis; Experimental Method...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Kobin H. Kendrick; | + | |Author(s)=Kobin H. Kendrick; |
|Title=Using Conversation Analysis in the Lab | |Title=Using Conversation Analysis in the Lab | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Laboratories; Conversation Analysis; Experimental Methods; Methodology; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Laboratories; Conversation Analysis; Experimental Methods; Methodology; |
|Key=Kendrick2017 | |Key=Kendrick2017 | ||
|Year=2017 | |Year=2017 | ||
| + | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Research on Language and Social Interaction | |Journal=Research on Language and Social Interaction | ||
|Volume=50 | |Volume=50 | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
|Pages=1-11 | |Pages=1-11 | ||
| + | |URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08351813.2017.1267911 | ||
|DOI=10.1080/08351813.2017.1267911 | |DOI=10.1080/08351813.2017.1267911 | ||
| − | |Abstract=In this introduction to the special issue of Research on Language and Social | + | |Abstract=In this introduction to the special issue of Research on Language and Social Interaction on “Experimental and Laboratory Approaches to Conversation Analysis,” I make the case that while naturalistic observation should take precedence over other methods, Conversation Analysis as a field should embrace a methodological pluralism that includes not only quantification but also experimentation and laboratory observation. Before I introduce the contributions to the special issue, I discuss the prohibition against such methods in the field, situate naturalistic and laboratory research on a methodological continuum, and develop a series of arguments in favor of experimental and laboratory studies of interaction. |
| − | Interaction on “Experimental and Laboratory Approaches to Conversation | ||
| − | Analysis,” I make the case that while naturalistic observation should take | ||
| − | precedence over other methods, Conversation Analysis as a field should | ||
| − | embrace a methodological pluralism that includes not only quantification | ||
| − | but also experimentation and laboratory observation. Before I introduce the | ||
| − | contributions to the special issue, I discuss the prohibition against such | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | laboratory studies of interaction. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 06:30, 13 September 2023
| Kendrick2017 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Kendrick2017 |
| Author(s) | Kobin H. Kendrick |
| Title | Using Conversation Analysis in the Lab |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Laboratories, Conversation Analysis, Experimental Methods, Methodology |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2017 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Research on Language and Social Interaction |
| Volume | 50 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 1-11 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/08351813.2017.1267911 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In this introduction to the special issue of Research on Language and Social Interaction on “Experimental and Laboratory Approaches to Conversation Analysis,” I make the case that while naturalistic observation should take precedence over other methods, Conversation Analysis as a field should embrace a methodological pluralism that includes not only quantification but also experimentation and laboratory observation. Before I introduce the contributions to the special issue, I discuss the prohibition against such methods in the field, situate naturalistic and laboratory research on a methodological continuum, and develop a series of arguments in favor of experimental and laboratory studies of interaction.
Notes
