Difference between revisions of "Lee2006"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Seung-Hee Lee; |Title=Second summonings in Korean telephone conversation openings |Tag(s)=EMCA; Korean; Telephone; Openings; Summons;...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Seung-Hee Lee;  
+
|Author(s)=Seung-Hee Lee;
 
|Title=Second summonings in Korean telephone conversation openings
 
|Title=Second summonings in Korean telephone conversation openings
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Korean; Telephone; Openings; Summons;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Korean; Telephone; Openings; Summons;
 
|Key=Lee2006
 
|Key=Lee2006
 
|Year=2006
 
|Year=2006
 
|Journal=Language in Society
 
|Journal=Language in Society
 
|Volume=35
 
|Volume=35
|Pages=261-283
+
|Number=2
 +
|Pages=261–283
 
|URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/div-classtitlesecond-summonings-in-korean-telephone-conversation-openingsdiv/F37B8D2F9E262DCFD2BF5BF8A59E4BB2
 
|URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/div-classtitlesecond-summonings-in-korean-telephone-conversation-openingsdiv/F37B8D2F9E262DCFD2BF5BF8A59E4BB2
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060118
+
|DOI=10.1017/S0047404506060118
 
|Abstract=This article is triggered by an analytic puzzle. In about half of a corpus of Korean telephone openings, callers produce a second summons, yeposeyyo, in the second turn of the opening sequence. The analysis unravels the interactional and organizational contingencies involved in the construction of the caller's second summons. It shows that the second summons operates as a vehicle for inviting recognition, and that the answerers overlay their work of recognition onto their talk in the third turn. In this way, the parties confront, work through, and display their underlying orientation to the organizational problem of establishing each other's identity in dealing with the second summons/answer sequence.An earlier version of this article was presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics in 2004. I would like to thank John Heritage, Manny Schegloff, and Sung-Ock Sohn for valuable comments on earlier drafts. Barbara Johnstone and two anonymous readers for this journal also gave helpful advice.
 
|Abstract=This article is triggered by an analytic puzzle. In about half of a corpus of Korean telephone openings, callers produce a second summons, yeposeyyo, in the second turn of the opening sequence. The analysis unravels the interactional and organizational contingencies involved in the construction of the caller's second summons. It shows that the second summons operates as a vehicle for inviting recognition, and that the answerers overlay their work of recognition onto their talk in the third turn. In this way, the parties confront, work through, and display their underlying orientation to the organizational problem of establishing each other's identity in dealing with the second summons/answer sequence.An earlier version of this article was presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics in 2004. I would like to thank John Heritage, Manny Schegloff, and Sung-Ock Sohn for valuable comments on earlier drafts. Barbara Johnstone and two anonymous readers for this journal also gave helpful advice.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 10:13, 13 November 2019

Lee2006
BibType ARTICLE
Key Lee2006
Author(s) Seung-Hee Lee
Title Second summonings in Korean telephone conversation openings
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Korean, Telephone, Openings, Summons
Publisher
Year 2006
Language
City
Month
Journal Language in Society
Volume 35
Number 2
Pages 261–283
URL Link
DOI 10.1017/S0047404506060118
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This article is triggered by an analytic puzzle. In about half of a corpus of Korean telephone openings, callers produce a second summons, yeposeyyo, in the second turn of the opening sequence. The analysis unravels the interactional and organizational contingencies involved in the construction of the caller's second summons. It shows that the second summons operates as a vehicle for inviting recognition, and that the answerers overlay their work of recognition onto their talk in the third turn. In this way, the parties confront, work through, and display their underlying orientation to the organizational problem of establishing each other's identity in dealing with the second summons/answer sequence.An earlier version of this article was presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics in 2004. I would like to thank John Heritage, Manny Schegloff, and Sung-Ock Sohn for valuable comments on earlier drafts. Barbara Johnstone and two anonymous readers for this journal also gave helpful advice.

Notes