Difference between revisions of "Jones-Thornborrow2004"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Rod Jones; Joanna Thornborrow; |Title=Floors, Talk and the Organization of Classroom Activities |Tag(s)=EMCA; Floor; one-at-a-time; coll...")
 
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Author(s)=Rod Jones; Joanna Thornborrow;
 
|Author(s)=Rod Jones; Joanna Thornborrow;
|Title=Floors, Talk and the Organization of Classroom Activities
+
|Title=Floors, talk and the organization of classroom activities
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Floor; one-at-a-time; collaborative activity; classroom; discourse; organization of talk;
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Floor; one-at-a-time; collaborative activity; classroom; discourse; organization of talk;
 
|Key=Jones-Thornborrow2004
 
|Key=Jones-Thornborrow2004
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|Volume=33
 
|Volume=33
 
|Number=3
 
|Number=3
|Pages=399-423
+
|Pages=399–423
|URL=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4169354
+
|URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/floors-talk-and-the-organization-of-classroom-activities/8BEAF44E989EA29088BADA6F11583B08
|DOI=10.1017/S0047404505043047
+
|DOI=10.1017/S0047404504043040
|Abstract= This article addresses the issue of the conversational floor. Using data from
+
|Abstract=This article addresses the issue of the conversational floor. Using data from classroom discourse, covering a wide range of floor related phenomena, the authors propose a concept of the floor that ties it to the activity in hand, and the local flexible organization of talk within that activity. After beginning with a short review of current work relating to the conversational floor, discussion turns to extracts from data as examples of various types of activities requiring different structures of participation. The aim is to move from binary definitions of the floor, particularly the opposition between one-at-a-time and collaborative, and toward a conceptualization of the floor as a continuum between “tighter” and “looser” organizations of talk in the activity.
classroom discourse, covering a wide range of floor related phenomena, the
 
authors propose a concept of the floor that ties it to the activity in hand, and
 
the local flexible organization of talk within that activity. After beginning with
 
a short review of current work relating to the conversational floor, discussion
 
turns to extracts from data as examples of various types of activities requir-
 
ing different structures of participation. The aim is to move from binary def-
 
initions of the floor, particularly the opposition between one-at-a-time and
 
collaborative, and toward a conceptualization of the floor as a continuum be-
 
tween "tighter" and "looser" organizations of talk in the activity.  
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 03:17, 1 November 2019

Jones-Thornborrow2004
BibType ARTICLE
Key Jones-Thornborrow2004
Author(s) Rod Jones, Joanna Thornborrow
Title Floors, talk and the organization of classroom activities
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Floor, one-at-a-time, collaborative activity, classroom, discourse, organization of talk
Publisher
Year 2004
Language
City
Month
Journal Language in Society
Volume 33
Number 3
Pages 399–423
URL Link
DOI 10.1017/S0047404504043040
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This article addresses the issue of the conversational floor. Using data from classroom discourse, covering a wide range of floor related phenomena, the authors propose a concept of the floor that ties it to the activity in hand, and the local flexible organization of talk within that activity. After beginning with a short review of current work relating to the conversational floor, discussion turns to extracts from data as examples of various types of activities requiring different structures of participation. The aim is to move from binary definitions of the floor, particularly the opposition between one-at-a-time and collaborative, and toward a conceptualization of the floor as a continuum between “tighter” and “looser” organizations of talk in the activity.

Notes