Difference between revisions of "Ramanathan-Abbott1994"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Vai Ramanathan-Abbott |Title=Interactional Differences in Alzheimer's Discourse: An Examination of AD Speech across Two Audiences |Tag(...")
 
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Author(s)=Vai Ramanathan-Abbott
 
|Author(s)=Vai Ramanathan-Abbott
|Title=Interactional Differences in Alzheimer's Discourse: An Examination of AD Speech across Two
+
|Title=Interactional differences in Alzheimer's discourse: an examination of AD speech across two audiences
Audiences
 
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Discourse analysis; Alzheimer's  disease; narrative social  interaction;
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Discourse analysis; Alzheimer's  disease; narrative social  interaction;
 
|Key=Ramanathan-Abbott1994
 
|Key=Ramanathan-Abbott1994
Line 10: Line 9:
 
|Volume=23
 
|Volume=23
 
|Number=1
 
|Number=1
|Pages=31-58
+
|Pages=31–58
|URL=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4168493
+
|URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/interactional-differences-in-alzheimers-discourse-an-examination-of-ad-speech-across-two-audiences/28C25DDD2405C1E904ECD4E2F6791998
|Abstract=Assessments of the narrative abilities of patients suffering from Alzhei-
+
|DOI=10.1017/S0047404500017668
mer's disease should consider the interactions that generate the narra-
+
|Abstract=Assessments of the narrative abilities of patients suffering from Alzheimer's disease should consider the interactions that generate the narratives. By analyzing the discourse of an AD patient in interaction with two different interlocutors, namely her husband and the author, this study calls attention to ways in which one interaction facilitates narratives and the other does not. Previous psycholinguistic research, largely focusing on the resultant narrative, has understood the AD patient's deteriorating narrative skills as a result of the progressively debilitating nature of the disease. This is undoubtedly true, but extensive and meaningful talk is nevertheless possible, partially grounded in and constructed through social interaction.
tives. By analyzing the discourse of an AD patient in interaction with  
 
two different interlocutors, namely her husband and the author, this  
 
study calls attention to ways in which one interaction facilitates narra-
 
tives and the other does not. Previous psycholinguistic research, largely  
 
focusing on the resultant narrative, has understood the AD patient's  
 
deteriorating narrative skills as a result of the progressively debilitating  
 
nature of the disease. This is undoubtedly true, but extensive and mean-
 
ingful talk is nevertheless possible, partially grounded in and constructed  
 
through social interaction.  
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 01:11, 24 October 2019

Ramanathan-Abbott1994
BibType ARTICLE
Key Ramanathan-Abbott1994
Author(s) Vai Ramanathan-Abbott
Title Interactional differences in Alzheimer's discourse: an examination of AD speech across two audiences
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Discourse analysis, Alzheimer's disease, narrative social interaction
Publisher
Year 1994
Language
City
Month
Journal Language in Society
Volume 23
Number 1
Pages 31–58
URL Link
DOI 10.1017/S0047404500017668
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Assessments of the narrative abilities of patients suffering from Alzheimer's disease should consider the interactions that generate the narratives. By analyzing the discourse of an AD patient in interaction with two different interlocutors, namely her husband and the author, this study calls attention to ways in which one interaction facilitates narratives and the other does not. Previous psycholinguistic research, largely focusing on the resultant narrative, has understood the AD patient's deteriorating narrative skills as a result of the progressively debilitating nature of the disease. This is undoubtedly true, but extensive and meaningful talk is nevertheless possible, partially grounded in and constructed through social interaction.

Notes