Difference between revisions of "Auer2007"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Peter Auer; |Title=Why are increments such elusive objects? An afterthought |Tag(s)=IL; Increments; TCU; Unit expansion; |Key=Auer2007...") |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Peter Auer; | + | |Author(s)=Peter Auer; |
|Title=Why are increments such elusive objects? An afterthought | |Title=Why are increments such elusive objects? An afterthought | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=IL; Increments; TCU; Unit expansion; | + | |Tag(s)=IL; Increments; TCU; Unit expansion; |
|Key=Auer2007 | |Key=Auer2007 | ||
|Year=2007 | |Year=2007 | ||
| + | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Pragmatics | |Journal=Pragmatics | ||
|Volume=17 | |Volume=17 | ||
|Number=4 | |Number=4 | ||
|DOI=10.1075/prag.17.4.03aue | |DOI=10.1075/prag.17.4.03aue | ||
| + | |Abstract=It is argued that the type of unit expansions called ‘increments’ by Schegloff 1996 is too narrowly focused on English. While the structure of English makes it particularly suited for this kind of expansion, a typologically more satisfactory approach to unit expansion runs into problems if it remains on the syntactic plane alone. A full typology will have to take into account, not only prosody and semantics, but also action structure and pragmatics at large. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 08:54, 2 January 2018
| Auer2007 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Auer2007 |
| Author(s) | Peter Auer |
| Title | Why are increments such elusive objects? An afterthought |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | IL, Increments, TCU, Unit expansion |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2007 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Pragmatics |
| Volume | 17 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | |
| URL | |
| DOI | 10.1075/prag.17.4.03aue |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
It is argued that the type of unit expansions called ‘increments’ by Schegloff 1996 is too narrowly focused on English. While the structure of English makes it particularly suited for this kind of expansion, a typologically more satisfactory approach to unit expansion runs into problems if it remains on the syntactic plane alone. A full typology will have to take into account, not only prosody and semantics, but also action structure and pragmatics at large.
Notes
