Difference between revisions of "Schmale2016"
m |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
− | |Author(s)= | + | |Author(s)=Gunter Schmale; |
|Title=La définition-en-interaction : La définition du sens comme accomplissement interactif | |Title=La définition-en-interaction : La définition du sens comme accomplissement interactif | ||
|Tag(s)=Interactional Linguistics; conversation analysis; corpus; definition-in-interaction; interactivity; intercomprehension | |Tag(s)=Interactional Linguistics; conversation analysis; corpus; definition-in-interaction; interactivity; intercomprehension | ||
|Key=Schmale2016 | |Key=Schmale2016 | ||
|Year=2016 | |Year=2016 | ||
+ | |Language=French | ||
|Journal=Langages | |Journal=Langages | ||
|Volume=204 | |Volume=204 |
Revision as of 09:04, 13 October 2017
Schmale2016 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Schmale2016 |
Author(s) | Gunter Schmale |
Title | La définition-en-interaction : La définition du sens comme accomplissement interactif |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | Interactional Linguistics, conversation analysis, corpus, definition-in-interaction, interactivity, intercomprehension |
Publisher | |
Year | 2016 |
Language | French |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Langages |
Volume | 204 |
Number | 4 |
Pages | |
URL | |
DOI | |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
Starting out from the fundamental role of intercomprehension in conversation, the article studies definitorial activities as one of the procedures aiming at the establishment of a satisfactory degree of meaning to reciprocal activities allowing the poursuit of communicative objectives. Based on a corpus-driven analysis of six conversational sequences from different contexts involving activities delimitating the ‘signified' (signifié) as well as the possibility to identify the referent of a ‘signified', the author examines definitorial activities as phenomena of definitionin-interaction. These are marked by the following characteristics: their interactiveness, the diversity of forms, their more or less developed form, their ‘natural', non-scientific and uncertain nature.
Notes