Difference between revisions of "Hutchby1997"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Ian Hutchby; |Title=Building alignments in public debate: A case study from British TV |Tag(s)=EMCA; Debates; Alignment; Conversation A...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Ian Hutchby; | + | |Author(s)=Ian Hutchby; |
|Title=Building alignments in public debate: A case study from British TV | |Title=Building alignments in public debate: A case study from British TV | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Debates; Alignment; Conversation Analysis; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Debates; Alignment; Conversation Analysis; |
|Key=Hutchby1997 | |Key=Hutchby1997 | ||
|Year=1997 | |Year=1997 | ||
|Journal=Text | |Journal=Text | ||
|Volume=17 | |Volume=17 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Number=2 |
| + | |Pages=161–179 | ||
|URL=https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/text.1.1997.17.issue-2/text.1.1997.17.2.161/text.1.1997.17.2.161.xml | |URL=https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/text.1.1997.17.issue-2/text.1.1997.17.2.161/text.1.1997.17.2.161.xml | ||
|DOI=10.1515/text.1.1997.17.2.161 | |DOI=10.1515/text.1.1997.17.2.161 | ||
| + | |Abstract=This artide analyses how talk is managed in a TV debate show, where politicans discuss issues in the presence of a Studio audience. Taking äs its case an episode from the British TV show Question Time, it examines the contextually sensitive use of conversational resources to build a local structure of alignment and counter-alignment between two disputing panel members and sections of the Studio audience. Analyzing a single case in detail, the article focusses on the use of recompletiont a rhetorical device described in previous work on political rhetoric (Atkinson, 1984), to construct sides in 'live political talk on TV. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:34, 20 October 2019
| Hutchby1997 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Hutchby1997 |
| Author(s) | Ian Hutchby |
| Title | Building alignments in public debate: A case study from British TV |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Debates, Alignment, Conversation Analysis |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1997 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Text |
| Volume | 17 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 161–179 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1515/text.1.1997.17.2.161 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This artide analyses how talk is managed in a TV debate show, where politicans discuss issues in the presence of a Studio audience. Taking äs its case an episode from the British TV show Question Time, it examines the contextually sensitive use of conversational resources to build a local structure of alignment and counter-alignment between two disputing panel members and sections of the Studio audience. Analyzing a single case in detail, the article focusses on the use of recompletiont a rhetorical device described in previous work on political rhetoric (Atkinson, 1984), to construct sides in 'live political talk on TV.
Notes
