Difference between revisions of "Holt2000"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Elizabeth Holt; |Title=Reporting and reacting: Concurrent responses to reported speech |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Reported Sp...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Elizabeth Holt;  
+
|Author(s)=Elizabeth Holt;
|Title=Reporting and reacting: Concurrent responses to reported speech
+
|Title=Reporting and reacting: concurrent responses to reported speech
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Reported Speech; Concurrent Responses
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Reported Speech; Concurrent Responses
 
|Key=Holt2000
 
|Key=Holt2000
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|Volume=33
 
|Volume=33
 
|Number=4
 
|Number=4
|Pages=425-454
+
|Pages=425–454
 
|URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_04
 
|URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_04
|DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_04
+
|DOI=10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_04
 
|Abstract=This article uses conversation analysis to investigate reported speech in talk-in-interaction. Beginning with an examination of direct and indirect reported speech, it highlights some of the design features of the former, and the sequential environments in which it occurs. Recent research on direct reported speech in interaction has shown that although it purports to be the accurate replaying of a former locution, speakers can simultaneously convey their assessment of the utterance while reproducing it. This investigation focuses on how speakers implicitly comment on a reported utterance, exploring the design and sequential placement of the device within the ongoing talk. It is found that direct reported speech recurs in making complaints and telling amusing stories. In addition, explicit assessment of the reported utterance is made commonly by the recipient in the next turn, and the reporter often collaborates with the recipient's response by producing a similar one in overlap. Thus, participants react concurrently to the reported utterance.
 
|Abstract=This article uses conversation analysis to investigate reported speech in talk-in-interaction. Beginning with an examination of direct and indirect reported speech, it highlights some of the design features of the former, and the sequential environments in which it occurs. Recent research on direct reported speech in interaction has shown that although it purports to be the accurate replaying of a former locution, speakers can simultaneously convey their assessment of the utterance while reproducing it. This investigation focuses on how speakers implicitly comment on a reported utterance, exploring the design and sequential placement of the device within the ongoing talk. It is found that direct reported speech recurs in making complaints and telling amusing stories. In addition, explicit assessment of the reported utterance is made commonly by the recipient in the next turn, and the reporter often collaborates with the recipient's response by producing a similar one in overlap. Thus, participants react concurrently to the reported utterance.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 10:54, 27 October 2019

Holt2000
BibType ARTICLE
Key Holt2000
Author(s) Elizabeth Holt
Title Reporting and reacting: concurrent responses to reported speech
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Reported Speech, Concurrent Responses
Publisher
Year 2000
Language
City
Month
Journal Research on Language and Social Interaction
Volume 33
Number 4
Pages 425–454
URL Link
DOI 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_04
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This article uses conversation analysis to investigate reported speech in talk-in-interaction. Beginning with an examination of direct and indirect reported speech, it highlights some of the design features of the former, and the sequential environments in which it occurs. Recent research on direct reported speech in interaction has shown that although it purports to be the accurate replaying of a former locution, speakers can simultaneously convey their assessment of the utterance while reproducing it. This investigation focuses on how speakers implicitly comment on a reported utterance, exploring the design and sequential placement of the device within the ongoing talk. It is found that direct reported speech recurs in making complaints and telling amusing stories. In addition, explicit assessment of the reported utterance is made commonly by the recipient in the next turn, and the reporter often collaborates with the recipient's response by producing a similar one in overlap. Thus, participants react concurrently to the reported utterance.

Notes