Difference between revisions of "Bolden2010"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Author(s)=Galina B. Bolden;
 
|Author(s)=Galina B. Bolden;
|Title=Articulating the unsaid via and-prefaced formulations of others’ talk
+
|Title=“Articulating the unsaid” via and-prefaced formulations of others’ talk
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Affiliation; Confirmation requests; Discourse Markers; Formulations; Repair;
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Affiliation; Confirmation requests; Discourse Markers; Formulations; Repair; Allusion
 
|Key=Bolden2010
 
|Key=Bolden2010
 
|Year=2010
 
|Year=2010
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|Volume=12
 
|Volume=12
 
|Number=1
 
|Number=1
|Pages=5-32
+
|Pages=5–32
|URL=http://dis.sagepub.com/content/12/1/5.short
+
|URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461445609346770
 
|DOI=10.1177/1461445609346770
 
|DOI=10.1177/1461445609346770
 
|Abstract=This article provides a conversation analytic description of a previously unstudied conversational action: ‘articulating the unsaid’ via and-prefaced formulations of other people’s talk. Contributing to the extant research on formulations and on interactional functions of discourse markers, the article shows that and-prefaced formulations accomplish a distinct conversational action that has the following features: these formulations are assertions about the addressee’s domain of knowledge that perform a repair operation in the form of a request for confirmation; they articulate a ‘missing’ element of the addressee’s preceding talk (which is, typically, an extended informing turn); what is being formulated is claimably inferable from the prior talk; moreover, such formulations extend the addressee’s course of action on his/her behalf. The article describes compositional and sequential features of and-prefaced formulations and how they shape interactional trajectories of in-progress courses of action.
 
|Abstract=This article provides a conversation analytic description of a previously unstudied conversational action: ‘articulating the unsaid’ via and-prefaced formulations of other people’s talk. Contributing to the extant research on formulations and on interactional functions of discourse markers, the article shows that and-prefaced formulations accomplish a distinct conversational action that has the following features: these formulations are assertions about the addressee’s domain of knowledge that perform a repair operation in the form of a request for confirmation; they articulate a ‘missing’ element of the addressee’s preceding talk (which is, typically, an extended informing turn); what is being formulated is claimably inferable from the prior talk; moreover, such formulations extend the addressee’s course of action on his/her behalf. The article describes compositional and sequential features of and-prefaced formulations and how they shape interactional trajectories of in-progress courses of action.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 08:08, 24 August 2022

Bolden2010
BibType ARTICLE
Key Bolden2010
Author(s) Galina B. Bolden
Title “Articulating the unsaid” via and-prefaced formulations of others’ talk
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Affiliation, Confirmation requests, Discourse Markers, Formulations, Repair, Allusion
Publisher
Year 2010
Language
City
Month
Journal Discourse Studies
Volume 12
Number 1
Pages 5–32
URL Link
DOI 10.1177/1461445609346770
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This article provides a conversation analytic description of a previously unstudied conversational action: ‘articulating the unsaid’ via and-prefaced formulations of other people’s talk. Contributing to the extant research on formulations and on interactional functions of discourse markers, the article shows that and-prefaced formulations accomplish a distinct conversational action that has the following features: these formulations are assertions about the addressee’s domain of knowledge that perform a repair operation in the form of a request for confirmation; they articulate a ‘missing’ element of the addressee’s preceding talk (which is, typically, an extended informing turn); what is being formulated is claimably inferable from the prior talk; moreover, such formulations extend the addressee’s course of action on his/her behalf. The article describes compositional and sequential features of and-prefaced formulations and how they shape interactional trajectories of in-progress courses of action.

Notes