Difference between revisions of "Heritage1994"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=John Heritage; Marja-Leena Sorjonen; | |Author(s)=John Heritage; Marja-Leena Sorjonen; | ||
| − | |Title=Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: | + | |Title=Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: and-prefacing as a feature of question design |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical EMCA; conversation analysis; institutional interaction; turn design; Questions; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical EMCA; conversation analysis; institutional interaction; turn design; Questions; |
|Key=Heritage1994 | |Key=Heritage1994 | ||
|Year=1994 | |Year=1994 | ||
|Journal=Language in Society | |Journal=Language in Society | ||
|Volume=23 | |Volume=23 | ||
| + | |Number=1 | ||
|Pages=1–29 | |Pages=1–29 | ||
| − | |URL= | + | |URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/constituting-and-maintaining-activities-across-sequences-andprefacing-as-a-feature-of-question-design/A8EE77F9DA4933C6C53AAFCB6659BD43 |
| − | |Abstract=The role of the connective and is here considered as a preface to questions in spoken interaction. Using data from informal medical encounters, it is argued that and-prefacing is used to link a question to a preceding question/answer pair or pairs. In such contexts, and-prefacing indicates that the questions it prefaces have a routine or agenda-based character. This in turn can be a resource which invokes and sustains an | + | |DOI=10.1017/S0047404500017656 |
| + | |Abstract=The role of the connective and is here considered as a preface to questions in spoken interaction. Using data from informal medical encounters, it is argued that and-prefacing is used to link a question to a preceding question/answer pair or pairs. In such contexts, and-prefacing indicates that the questions it prefaces have a routine or agenda-based character. This in turn can be a resource which invokes and sustains an orientation to an activity or course of action that is implemented through a series of question/answer pairs, but transcends any individual pair. The general characteristics of and-prefaced questions are contrasted with “contingent” or “follow-up” questions, which are not normally and-prefaced. Some strategic uses of and-prefaced questions are described, and the role of the device within the more general sociolinguistic context of the data is discussed. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:45, 24 October 2019
| Heritage1994 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Heritage1994 |
| Author(s) | John Heritage, Marja-Leena Sorjonen |
| Title | Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: and-prefacing as a feature of question design |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Medical EMCA, conversation analysis, institutional interaction, turn design, Questions |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1994 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Language in Society |
| Volume | 23 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 1–29 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0047404500017656 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The role of the connective and is here considered as a preface to questions in spoken interaction. Using data from informal medical encounters, it is argued that and-prefacing is used to link a question to a preceding question/answer pair or pairs. In such contexts, and-prefacing indicates that the questions it prefaces have a routine or agenda-based character. This in turn can be a resource which invokes and sustains an orientation to an activity or course of action that is implemented through a series of question/answer pairs, but transcends any individual pair. The general characteristics of and-prefaced questions are contrasted with “contingent” or “follow-up” questions, which are not normally and-prefaced. Some strategic uses of and-prefaced questions are described, and the role of the device within the more general sociolinguistic context of the data is discussed.
Notes
