Difference between revisions of "Abell1999"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Jackie Abell; Elizabeth H. Stokoe | + | |Author(s)=Jackie Abell; Elizabeth H. Stokoe; |
| − | |Title= | + | |Title=“I Take Full Responsibility, I Take Some Responsibility, I'll Take Half of it But No More Than That”: Princess Diana and the Negotiation of Blame in the “Panorama” Interview |
|Tag(s)=Discursive Psychology; | |Tag(s)=Discursive Psychology; | ||
|Key=Abell1999 | |Key=Abell1999 | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
|Pages=297-319 | |Pages=297-319 | ||
| − | |URL= | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1461445699001003002 |
|DOI=10.1177/1461445699001003002 | |DOI=10.1177/1461445699001003002 | ||
| + | |Abstract=The focus of this article is the conversational management of blaming and accountability. In particular, we explore how involved speakers routinely allocate and avoid blame in everyday talk. In considering such a problematic notion of social interaction, we analyse the BBC interview between Princess Diana and Martin Bashir that was aired on British national television on 20 November 1995. In the analysis, we consider how different discursive strategies are employed by speakers in ways that work up credible and authentic accounts. More specifically, we argue that Diana attributes blame to external `others' within a negotiated context of routine description of past events. Categories such as `the media', `the royal household' and `Charles' are constructed and made relevant throughout the interview and the analytic interest is what is accomplished rhetorically for both Diana and Bashir. Of further interest is the overall script design of the interview and how devices such as script formulation, stake management, footing shifts and progressive narrative function in the negotiation of blame. We conclude that `doing blaming' is attended to and managed locally by participants in conversation and this `doing' can be accomplished in a number of ways. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:32, 27 October 2019
| Abell1999 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Abell1999 |
| Author(s) | Jackie Abell, Elizabeth H. Stokoe |
| Title | “I Take Full Responsibility, I Take Some Responsibility, I'll Take Half of it But No More Than That”: Princess Diana and the Negotiation of Blame in the “Panorama” Interview |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | Discursive Psychology |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1999 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 1 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 297-319 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445699001003002 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The focus of this article is the conversational management of blaming and accountability. In particular, we explore how involved speakers routinely allocate and avoid blame in everyday talk. In considering such a problematic notion of social interaction, we analyse the BBC interview between Princess Diana and Martin Bashir that was aired on British national television on 20 November 1995. In the analysis, we consider how different discursive strategies are employed by speakers in ways that work up credible and authentic accounts. More specifically, we argue that Diana attributes blame to external `others' within a negotiated context of routine description of past events. Categories such as `the media', `the royal household' and `Charles' are constructed and made relevant throughout the interview and the analytic interest is what is accomplished rhetorically for both Diana and Bashir. Of further interest is the overall script design of the interview and how devices such as script formulation, stake management, footing shifts and progressive narrative function in the negotiation of blame. We conclude that `doing blaming' is attended to and managed locally by participants in conversation and this `doing' can be accomplished in a number of ways.
Notes
