Difference between revisions of "Haddington2004"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Pentti Haddington; |Title=Stance taking in news interviews |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Stance; Stance Taking; News interviews;...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Pentti Haddington; | + | |Author(s)=Pentti Haddington; |
|Title=Stance taking in news interviews | |Title=Stance taking in news interviews | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Stance; Stance Taking; News interviews; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Stance; Stance Taking; News interviews; |
|Key=Haddington2004 | |Key=Haddington2004 | ||
|Year=2004 | |Year=2004 | ||
|Journal=SKY Journal of Linguistics | |Journal=SKY Journal of Linguistics | ||
|Volume=17 | |Volume=17 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=101–142 |
| − | |URL= | + | |URL=http://www.linguistics.fi/julkaisut/SKY2004/Haddington.pdf |
| − | |Abstract=This paper has two aims. First, section 2 introduces a summary of the theory of my | + | |Abstract=This paper has two aims. First, section 2 introduces a summary of the theory of my dissertation (Haddington to appear). In it I provide an overview of an approach which combines, on the one hand, the successes and tools of conversation analysis, and on the other hand, the discourse-functional “theory of stance” (Du Bois 2004). I further suggest that in order to look at how co-participants construct and display their stances, an analysis of the simultaneously deployed linguistic resources, sequential aspects of turn design and turn construction, is required. Second, in section 3, I focus on the question of how stance taking can be studied with news interview data and consider an example of an intersubjective stance-taking activity called positioning / alignment. The second part of the paper relates to the author’s other work (Haddington 2002, to appear, under review-a, under review-b) which provide more detailed empirical accounts of stance taking and also the stance-taking activity reported at the end of this paper. |
| − | dissertation (Haddington to appear). In it I provide an overview of an approach which | ||
| − | combines, on the one hand, the successes and tools of conversation analysis, and on the | ||
| − | other hand, the discourse-functional “theory of stance” (Du Bois 2004). I further | ||
| − | suggest that in order to look at how co-participants construct and display their stances, | ||
| − | an analysis of the simultaneously deployed linguistic resources, sequential aspects of | ||
| − | turn design and turn construction, is required. Second, in section 3, I focus on the | ||
| − | question of how stance taking can be studied with news interview data and consider an | ||
| − | example of an intersubjective stance-taking activity called positioning / alignment. The | ||
| − | second part of the paper relates to the author’s other work (Haddington 2002, to appear, | ||
| − | under review-a, under review-b) which provide more detailed empirical accounts of | ||
| − | stance taking and also the stance-taking activity reported at the end of this | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 03:44, 1 November 2019
| Haddington2004 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Haddington2004 |
| Author(s) | Pentti Haddington |
| Title | Stance taking in news interviews |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Stance, Stance Taking, News interviews |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2004 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | SKY Journal of Linguistics |
| Volume | 17 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 101–142 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This paper has two aims. First, section 2 introduces a summary of the theory of my dissertation (Haddington to appear). In it I provide an overview of an approach which combines, on the one hand, the successes and tools of conversation analysis, and on the other hand, the discourse-functional “theory of stance” (Du Bois 2004). I further suggest that in order to look at how co-participants construct and display their stances, an analysis of the simultaneously deployed linguistic resources, sequential aspects of turn design and turn construction, is required. Second, in section 3, I focus on the question of how stance taking can be studied with news interview data and consider an example of an intersubjective stance-taking activity called positioning / alignment. The second part of the paper relates to the author’s other work (Haddington 2002, to appear, under review-a, under review-b) which provide more detailed empirical accounts of stance taking and also the stance-taking activity reported at the end of this paper.
Notes
