Difference between revisions of "Deppermann2000"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Arnulf Deppermann; |Title=Ethnographische Gesprächsanalyse: Zu Nutzen und Notwendigkeit von Ethnographie für die Konversationsanalyse...") |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Arnulf Deppermann; | + | |Author(s)=Arnulf Deppermann; |
|Title=Ethnographische Gesprächsanalyse: Zu Nutzen und Notwendigkeit von Ethnographie für die Konversationsanalyse1 | |Title=Ethnographische Gesprächsanalyse: Zu Nutzen und Notwendigkeit von Ethnographie für die Konversationsanalyse1 | ||
| − | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; conversation analysis; ethnography; context; discourse analysis; qualitative methods; methodology; sociology of language; sociolinguistics; adolescents' slang; | |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; conversation analysis; ethnography; context; discourse analysis; qualitative methods; methodology; sociology of language; sociolinguistics; adolescents' slang; | ||
|Key=Deppermann2000 | |Key=Deppermann2000 | ||
|Year=2000 | |Year=2000 | ||
| + | |Language=German | ||
|Journal=Gesprächsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion | |Journal=Gesprächsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion | ||
|Volume=1 | |Volume=1 | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
quire ethnographic knowledge to be used in order to improve and validate a con- | quire ethnographic knowledge to be used in order to improve and validate a con- | ||
versation analytic study. The paper closes with a discussion of criteria for the adequacy to appeal to bits of ethnographic knowledge when analysing talk-in-inter- | versation analytic study. The paper closes with a discussion of criteria for the adequacy to appeal to bits of ethnographic knowledge when analysing talk-in-inter- | ||
| − | action. | + | action. |
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 03:07, 29 October 2017
| Deppermann2000 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Deppermann2000 |
| Author(s) | Arnulf Deppermann |
| Title | Ethnographische Gesprächsanalyse: Zu Nutzen und Notwendigkeit von Ethnographie für die Konversationsanalyse1 |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, conversation analysis, ethnography, context, discourse analysis, qualitative methods, methodology, sociology of language, sociolinguistics, adolescents' slang |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2000 |
| Language | German |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Gesprächsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion |
| Volume | 1 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 96-124 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
A rigid empirical and phenomenologically based methodology provides for con- versation analysis' advantages over other approaches to the study of discourse. This superiority, however, is seriously flawed at one point: CA misconstrues the indispensable role interpretation plays for the analysis of discourse. It therefore neglects the preconditions and the effects by which the analysts' knowledge in- evitably shapes the process and the results of conversation analytic studies. One sort of knowledge that is most important in this respect is ethnographic know- ledge. It is shown that there are several systematic issues which favor or even re- quire ethnographic knowledge to be used in order to improve and validate a con- versation analytic study. The paper closes with a discussion of criteria for the adequacy to appeal to bits of ethnographic knowledge when analysing talk-in-inter- action.
Notes
