|
|
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | * Abell, Jackie, Elizabeth H. Stokoe (1999) ‘“I take full responsibility, I take some responsibility, I’ll take half of it but no more than that”: Princess Diana and the location of blame in the Panorama interview’, Discourse Studies 1: 297-319
| + | Check https://www.dropbox.com/s/u9uzryfhwh579p1/DP-bib.pdf?dl=0 for the last update (last planned update to Paul's website was the 1st October 2014). |
| − | * Abell, Jackie, Elizabeth H. Stokoe (2001) ‘Broadcasting the royal role: Constructing culturally situated identities in Princess Diana’s “Panorama” interview’, British Journal of Social Psychology 40: 417-35
| + | |
| − | * Abell, Jackie, Elizabeth H. Stokoe, Michael Billig (2000) ‘Narrative and the discursive (re)construction of events. In M. Andrews, S.D. Sclater, C. Squire & A. Treacher’, eds.Lines of narrative. London: Routledge: 180-192
| + | We are in the process of digitizing this bibliography. If you would like to help - please check whether the items have been added to the site by searching for them in the PDF linked above... if not, why not [[how to help |help out]] by adding them yourself! |
| − | * Allistone, Simon, Robin Wooffitt (2007) ‘Negotiating consciousness: parapsychology and the social organisation of reports of mental states’. In: Alexa, Hepburn, Sally Wiggins, eds.
| |
| − | * Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 70-87
| |
| − | * Antaki, Charles (2004) ‘Reading minds or dealing with interactional implications’, Theory and Psychology 14: 667-83
| |
| − | * Antaki, Charles, Michael Billig, Derek Edwards, Jonathan Potter (2003) ‘Discourse analysis means doing analysis: A critique of six analytic shortcomings’,Discourse Analysis Online, 1, [ [http://www.shu.ac.uk/daol/articles/v1/n1/a1/antaki2002002-paper.html http://www.shu.ac.uk/daol/articles/v1/n1/a1/antaki2002002-paper.html][http://www.shu.ac.uk/daol/articles/v1/n1/a1/antaki2002002-paper.html ]].
| |
| − | * Antaki, Charles, Rebecca K.Barnes, Ivan Leudar (2005) ‘Self-disclosure as a situated interactional practice’, British Journal of Social Psychology44(2): 181–99.
| |
| − | * Antaki, Charles, Mark Rapley (1996). ‘“Quality of life” talk: The liberal paradox of psychological testing’, Discourse and Society, 7, 293-316.
| |
| − | * Auburn, Timothy (2005) ‘Narrative Reflexivity as a Repair Device for Discounting “Cognitive Distortions” in Sex Offender Treatment’, Discourse&Society16: 697-718
| |
| − | * Auburn, Timothy, Lea, S. (2003) ‘Doing Cognitive Distortions: A Discursive Psychology Analysis of Sex Offender Treatment Talk’, British Journal of Social Psychology 42: 281-98
| |
| − | * Augoustinos, Martha (2001) ‘History as a rhetorical resource: using historical narratives to argue and explain’. In: A. McHoul and M. Rapley (eds), How to Analyse Talk in Institutional Settings: A Casebook of Methods. London: Continuum: 135-145
| |
| − | * Augoustinos, Martha, Amanda Lecouteur and Kathryn Fogarty (2007) ’Apologising-in-action: on saying ‘sorry’ to Indigenous Australians’. In: Alexa, Hepburn, Sally Wiggins, eds. Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 88-103
| |
| − | * Augoustinos, Martha; Cristian. Tileaga (2012)‘Twenty five years of discursive psychology’,
| |
| − | * British Journal of Social Psychology. 51/3, 405-412
| |
| − | * Augoustinos, Martha, K. Tuffin, Mark Rapley(1999) ‘Genocide or a Failure to Gel? Racism, History and Nationalism in Australian Talk’, Discourse & Society 10: 351–78.
| |
| − | * Augoustinos, Martha, I. Walker, N. Donaghue (2006). Social cognition: An integrated introduction. London: Sage.
| |
| − | * Benwell, Bethan, Elizabeth H. Stokoe (2002) ‘The construction of discussion tasks in university tutorials’. Discourse Studies, 4 (4): 429-453
| |
| − | * Benwell, Bethan, Elizabeth H. Stokoe (2004). University students resisting academic identity. In P. Seedhouse & K. Richards (Eds.), Applying conversation analysis (pp. 124-139). Basingstoke: Palgrave
| |
| − | * Benwell, Bethan; Elizabeth Stokoe (2006). Discourse and identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
| |
| − | * Billig, Michael (2012) ‘Undisciplined beginnings, academic success, and discursive psychology’,
| |
| − | * British Journal of Social Psychology 51/3, 413-424
| |
| − | * Blumenthal, S., Gudjonsson, G., Burns, J. (1999) ‘Cognitive Distortions and Blame Attribution in Sex Offenders Against Adults and Children’, Child Abuse and Neglect 23: 129-43
| |
| − | * Blundell, I.E. (1980) ‘Hunger, Appetite and Satiety - Constructs in Search of Identities’, in M. Turner (ed.) Nutrition and Lifestyles,pp. 21-42. London: Applied Science
| |
| − | * Burningham, K. (1998) ‘Noisy Road or Noisy Resident? A Demonstration of the Utility of Social Constructionism for Analysing Environmental Problems’,Sociological Review 46: 536-63
| |
| − | * Buttny, Richard, Sandra Kellogg Rath (2007) ’Discursive practices in talking problems during a school-family meeting’. In: Alexa, Hepburn, Sally Wiggins, eds. Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:247-62
| |
| − | * Clarke, V., Celia Kitzinger, Jonathan Potter (2004) "‘Kids Are Just Cruel Anyway": Lesbian and Gay Parents’ Talk About Homophobic Bullying’,British Journal of Social Psychology 43: 531-50
| |
| − | * Childs, Carrie (2012) ‘Directing and requesting: two interactive uses of the mental state terms want and need’, Text & Talk 32/6: 727-749
| |
| − | * Cromdal, Jakob, Michael Tholander, Karin Aronsson (2007) ‘“Doing reluctance”: managing delivery of assessments in peer evaluation’. In: Alexa, Hepburn, Sally Wiggins, eds. Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 203-23
| |
| − | * Drew, Paul (2005) ‘Is Confusion a State of Mind?’, in H. te Molder J. Potter (eds) Conversation and Cognition,. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 161-83
| |
| − | * Durrheim, Kevin (2012) ‘Discourse, action, rhetoric: From a perception to an action paradigm in social psychology’, British Journal of Social Psychology 51/3, 456-462
| |
| − | * Edwards, Derek (1991) ‘Categories are for talking: On the cognitive and discursive bases of categorization’, Theory and Psychology1(4): 515–42.
| |
| − | * Edwards, Derek (1994) ‘Script Formulations: A Study of Event Descriptions in Conversation’Journal of Language and Social Psychology 13: 211-47
| |
| − | * Edwards, Derek (1995) ‘Two to Tango: Script Formulations, Dispositions, and Rhetorical Symmetry in Relationship Troubles Talk’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 28: 319-50
| |
| − | * Edwards, Derek (1995) ‘Sacks and Psychology’, Theory and Psychology5: 579-97
| |
| − | * Edwards, Derek (1997) Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage
| |
| − | * Edwards, Derek (1998) ‘The relevant thing about her: social identity categories in use’ In: Charles Antaki, Sue Widdicombe, eds. Identities in talk. London: Sage: 15-33
| |
| − | * Edwards, Derek (1999) ‘Emotion Discourse’, Culture & Psychology5: 271-91
| |
| − | * Edwards, Derek (1999) ‘Shared Knowledge as a Performative and Rhetorical Category’, in J. Verschueren (ed.) Pragmatics in 1998: Selected Papers From the 6th International Pragmatics Conference, Vol. 2, pp. 130-41. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association
| |
| − | * Edwards, Derek (2000) ’Extreme Case Formulations: Softeners, Investment, and Doing Nonliteral’ Research on Language and Social Interaction33: 347-73
| |
| − | * Edwards, Derek (2003) ‘Analyzing Racial Discourse: The Discursive Psychology of MindWorld Relationships’, in H. van den Berg, M. Wetherell H. Houtkoop-Steenstra (eds) Analyzing Race Talk: Multidisciplinary Approaches to the Interview,pp. 31-48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
| |
| − | * Edwards, Derek (2004) ‘Shared Knowledge as a Performative Category in Conversation’.Rivista Italiana di Psicolinguistica Applicata (RiPLA)4(2): 41-53. Special Issue edited by A. Fasulo & R. Galatolo, ‘L’Analisi del Parlato in Interazione’
| |
| − | * Edwards, Derek (2005) ‘Moaning, Whinging and Laughing: The Subjective Side of Complaints’
| |
| − | * Discourse Studies 7: 5-29
| |
| − | * Edwards, Derek (2005) ‘Discursive Psychology’, in K. Fitch and R. Sanders, eds. Handbook of Language and Social Interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum: 257–73
| |
| − | * Edwards, Derek (2006) ‘Discourse, cognition and social practices: the rich surface of Language and social interaction’, Discourse Studies8(1): 41–9.
| |
| − | * Edwards, Derek (2007) ‘Managing subjectivity in talk’. In: Alexa, Hepburn, Sally Wiggins, eds.
| |
| − | * Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 31-49
| |
| − | * Edwards, Derek (2008) ‘Intentionality and mens rea in police interrogations: the production of actions as crimes’, Intercultural Pragmatics 5(2): 177–199
| |
| − | * Edwards, Derek (2012) ‘Discursive and scientific psychology’, British Journal of Social Psychology 51/3, 425-435
| |
| − | * Edwards, Derek, Alessandra Fasulo (2006) ‘“To Be Honest”: sequential uses of honesty phrases in talk-in-interaction’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 39(4): 343–76.
| |
| − | * Edwards, Derek, Alexa Hepburn, Jonathan Potter (2009) ‘Psychology, sociology and interaction: disciplinary allegiance or analytic quality? — a response to Housley and Fitzgerald’, Qualitative Research 9: 119-128 [response to: Housley & Fitzgerald, 2008]
| |
| − | * Edwards, Derek, Jonathan Potter (1992) Discursive psychology. London: Sage
| |
| − | * Edwards, Derek, Jonathan Potter (1993) ‘Language and Causation: A Discourse Analytical Approach to Description and Attribution’, Psychological Review100: 23-41
| |
| − | * Edwards, Derek; Jonathan Potter (1999). ‘Language and causal attribution: A rejoinder to Schmid and Fiedler’, Theory & Psychology, 9: 849-63.
| |
| − | * Edwards, Derek, Jonathan Potter (2001) ‘Discursive Psychology’, in A.W McHoul M. Rapley (eds) How to Analyse Talk in Institutional Settings: A Casebook of Methods, pp. 12-24. London: Continuum International
| |
| − | * Edwards, Derek, Jonathan Potter (2005) ‘Discursive Psychology, Mental States and Descriptions’, in H. te Molder J. Potter (eds) Conversation and Cognition, pp. 241-59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
| |
| − | * Edwards, Derek, Elizabeth Stokoe (2004) ‘Discursive psychology, focus group interviews, and participants’ categories’. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 499-507
| |
| − | * Edwards, Derek, Elizabeth Stokoe (2007) ‘Self-help in calls for help with problem neighbours’,
| |
| − | * Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40 (1): 9-32
| |
| − | * Eriksson, Katarina, Karin Aronsson (2005) “’We’re Really Lucky”: Co-Creating “Us” and the “Other” in School Booktalk’, Discourse & Society16: 719-38
| |
| − | * Fasulo, Alessandra, Francesca Fiore (2007) ’A valid person: non-competence as a conversational outcome’. In: Alexa, Hepburn, Sally Wiggins, eds. Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 224-47
| |
| − | * Griffin, Christine (2007) ‘Being dead and being there: research interviews, sharing hand cream and the preference for analysing `naturally occurring data’, Discourse Studies 9: 246-269
| |
| − | * Griffin, Christine (2007) ‘Different visions: a rejoinder to Henwood, Potter and Hepburn’,
| |
| − | * Discourse Studies 9: 283-287
| |
| − | * Hammersley Martyn (2003) ‘Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis: Methods or Paradigms?’, Discourse & Society, 14: 751-81 [debate with Jonathan Potter on pages 783-804]
| |
| − | * Hammersley, Martyn (2003) ‘“Analytics” are No Substitute for Methodology: A Response to Speer and Hutchby’, Sociology 39: 339-51 [comment on: Speer & Hutchby, 2003 a; see also: rejoinder: Speer & Hutchby, 2003 b]
| |
| − | * Henwood, Karen (2007) ‘Beyond hypercriticality: taking forward methodological inquiry and debate in discursive and qualitative social psychology’, Discourse Studies 9: 270-275
| |
| − | * Hepburn, Alexa (2002) ‘Figuring gender in teachers’ talk about school bullying’. In P. McIlvenny, ed. Talking Gender and Sexuality. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 263-288
| |
| − | * Hepburn, Alexa , (2003). ‘On the alleged incompatibility between feminism and relativism’. In M. Gergen, K.J. Gergen, eds. Social Construction: A reader. London; Sage: 237-247. (This is an edited reprint of Alexa Hepburn (2000). ‘On the alleged incompatibility between feminism and relativism’,Feminism and Psychology. 10/1: 91-106.)
| |
| − | * Hepburn, Alexa (2004) ‘Crying: Notes on Description, Transcription, and Interaction’, Research on Language & Social Interaction37:251-91
| |
| − | * Hepburn, Alexa (2005) ‘“You’re not takin me seriously”: Ethics and asymmetry in calls to a child protection helpline’, Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 18, 255-276.
| |
| − | * Hepburn, Alexa (2006) ‘Getting closer at a distance: Theory and the contingencies of practice’,
| |
| − | * Theory & Psychology, 16/3: 325-342.
| |
| − | * Hepburn, Alexa (2006) ‘Deconstruction’. In V. Jupp, ed. The Sage dictionary of social research . London: Sage 62-64.
| |
| − | * Hepburn, Alexa (2006) ‘Constructionism’. In V. Jupp, ed. The Sage dictionary of social research. London: Sage: 38-40
| |
| − | * Hepburn, Alexa, S.J. Brown (2001) ‘Teacher Stress and the Management of Accountability’,Human Relations 54: 531-55
| |
| − | * Hepburn, Alexa; C. Jackson (2009) ‘Rethinking Subjectivity: A discursive psychological approach to cognition and emotion’. In D. Fox, I. Prilleltensky, S. Austin, eds. An introduction to critical psychology, 2nd ed. London: Sage.
| |
| − | * Hepburn, Alexa, Jonathan Potter (2004) ‘Discourse analytic practice’. In C. Seale, D. Silverman, J. Gubrium, G. Gobo, eds., Qualitative research practice. London: Sage:180-196 [reprinted in Paperback in 2007 at pages 168-84]
| |
| − | * Hepburn, Alexa, Jonathan Potter (2007). ‘Crying receipts: Time, empathy and institutional practice’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40, 89-116.
| |
| − | * Hepburn, Alexa, Jonathan Potter (2010). ‘Interrogating tears: Some uses of ‘tag questions’ in a child protection helpline’. In A.F. Freed, S. Ehrlich, eds. “Why Do You Ask?”: The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 69-86.
| |
| − | * Hepburn, Alexa;. Jonathan Potter (2011) ‘Threats: Power, family mealtimes and social influence’, British Journal of Social Psychology 50: 99-120
| |
| − | * Hepburn, Alexa, Sally Wiggins (Eds) (2005). ‘Developments in discursive psychology’, Special Issue of Discourse & Society 16/5: 595-747
| |
| − | * Hepburn, Alexa, Sally Wiggins (2005) ‘Size Matters: Constructing Accountable Bodies in NSPCC Helpline Interaction’, Discourse & Society16: 625-45
| |
| − | * Hepburn, Alexa. Sally Wiggins eds., (2007) Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
| |
| − | * Hepburn, Alexa, Sally Wiggins (2007) ‘Discursive research: themes and debates’. In: Alexa, Hepburn, Sally Wiggins, eds. Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 1-28
| |
| − | * Housley, William, Richard Fitzgerald (2008) ‘Motives and social organisation: sociological amnesia, psychological description and the analysis of accounts’,Qualitative Research. 8(2): 237-256.
| |
| − | * Housley, William, Richard Fitzgerald (2009) ‘Beyond the discursive: the case of social organization — a reply to Edwards, Hepburn and Potter’Qualitative Research 9: 129-133 [reply to: Edwards, Hepburn & Potter, 2009]
| |
| − | * Korobov, Neill (2011) ‘Gendering desire in speed-dating interactions’,Discourse Studies 13/4: 461-485
| |
| − | * Korobov, Neill (2011) ‘Mate-preference talk in speed-dating conversations’,Research on Language & Social Interaction 44/2: 186-209
| |
| − | * Kurri, K., J. Wahlström (2001). ‘Dialogic management of conflict in domestic violence counselling’, Feminism & Psychology, 11, 187-208.
| |
| − | * Lamerichs, Joyce, Hedwig te Molder (2003) ’Computer-Mediated Communication: From a Cognitive to a Discursive Model’, New Media and Society 5: 451-73
| |
| − | * Lamerichs, Joyce; Hedwig F.M. Te Molder (2009) ‘“And then I’m really like . . .”: `preliminary’ self-quotations in adolescent talk’, Discourse Studies 11: 401-419
| |
| − | * Lobley, John (2001) ‘Whose personality is it anyway? The production o “personality” in a diagnostic interview’. In: A. McHoul and M. Rapley (eds), How to Analyse Talk in Institutional Settings: A Casebook of Methods. London: Continuum: 113-123
| |
| − | * LeCouteur, Amanda (2001) ‘On saying “sorry”: repertoires of apology to Austra lia’s Stolen Generations’. In: A. McHoul and M. Rapley (eds), How to Analyse Talk in Institutional Settings: A Casebook of Methods. London: Continuum: 146-158
| |
| − | * Locke, A. Edwards, Derek (2003) ‘Bill and Monica: Memory, Emotion and Normativity in Clinton’s Grand Jury Testimony’, British Journal of Social Psychology 42: 239-56
| |
| − | * Macmartin, Clare, Curtis D. Lebaron (2007) ‘Arguing and thinking errors: cognitive distortion as a members’ category in sex offender group therapy talk’. In: Alexa, Hepburn, Sally Wiggins, eds.
| |
| − | * Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 147-65
| |
| − | * MacMillan, Katie, Derek Edwards (1999) ‘Who Killed the Princess? Description and Blame in the British Press’, Discourse Studies 1: 151-74
| |
| − | * McCarthy, Davis; Mar Rapley, (2001) ‘Far from the madding crowd: psychiatric diagnosis as the managment of moral accountability’. In: A. McHoul and M. Rapley (eds), How to Analyse Talk in Institutional Settings: A Casebook of Methods. London: Continuum: 159-167
| |
| − | * McHoul, Alec, Mark Rapley (2002) ‘Should We Make a Start Then: A strange case of (Delayed) client-initiated psychological assessment’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 35(1): 73–91
| |
| − | * Mogendorff, Karen; Hedwig te Molder, Cees van Woerkum, Bart Gremmen (2014) ‘We say: “…”: How plant science experts draw on reported dialogue to shelve user concerns’, Discourse and Communication, 8/2: 137-154
| |
| − | * Molder, Hedwig te, Jonathan Potter, eds. (2005) Conversation and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
| |
| − | * Moulding, N. Hepworth, J. (2001) ‘Understanding Body Image Disturbance in the Promotion of Mental Health: A Discourse Analytic Study’, Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 11: 305-17
| |
| − | * Parker, Ian (2012) ‘Discursive social psychology now’, British Journal of Social Psychology. 51/3, 471-477
| |
| − | * Nikander, Pirjo (1995) ‘The turn to the text: the critical potential of discursive social psychology’, Nordiske Udkast: Journal for Critical Social Science 2, 3-15.
| |
| − | * Nikander, Pirjo (2007) ‘Emotions in meeting talk’. In: Alexa, Hepburn, Sally Wiggins, eds.
| |
| − | * Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 50-69
| |
| − | * Nikander, Pirjo (2008) ‘Constructionism and Discourse Analysis’. In James, A. Holstein; Jaber F Gubrium, eds. Handbook of Constructionist Research. Guilford Press, New York: 413-428.
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan (1996) Representing Reality:Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan (1997) ‘Discourse Analysis as a Way of Analysing Naturally Occurring Talk’, in D. Silverman (ed.), Qualitative Research. London: Sage
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan (1998) ‘Cognition as context (whose cognition?)’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31, 29-44
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan (1998) ‘Discursive social psychology: from attitudes to evaluations’, European Review of Social Psychology 9: 233–66.
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan (2000) ‘Post cognitivist psychology’, Theory and Psychology, 10, 31-37
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan (2003) ‘Practical scepticism’, Discourse & Society, 14: 799-801.
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan (2003) ‘Discursive psychology: Between method and paradigm’,Discourse & Society, 14, 783-94
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan (2003) ‘Discourse analysis and discursive psychology’, in P.M. Camic, J.E. Rhodes and L. Yardley, eds. Qualitative Research in Psychology: Expanding Perspectives in Methodology and Design. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association: 73–94
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan (2005) ‘Making psychology relevant’, Discourse & Society, 16: 739-747.
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan (2006) ‘Cognition and conversation’, Discourse Studies, 8: 131-140
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan, ed. (2007) Discourse and Psychology:Volume III Discursive Psychology.
| |
| − | * London: Sage.
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan (2012) ‘Re-reading Discourse and Social Psychology: Transforming social psychology’, British Journal of Social Psychology 51/3, 436-455
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan, Derek Edwards (1999) ‘Social representations and discursive psychology’,
| |
| − | * Culture & Psychology, 5: 445-456
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan, Derek Edwards (2001) ‘Sociolinguistics, Cognitivism and Discursive Psychology’, in N. Coupland, S. Sarangi C. Candlin (eds)Sociolinguistics and Sucial Theory, pp. 88-103. London: Longman
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan, Derek Edwards (200l) ‘Discursive social psychology’, in W.P. Robinson, H. Giles, eds. Handbook of Language and Social Psychology.. London: WHey: 103-18
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan, Derek Edwards (2003) ‘Rethinking cognition: On Coulter, discourse and mind’,
| |
| − | * Human Studies, 26, 165-181
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan, Derek Edwards (2003) ‘Sociolinguistics, cognitivism and discursive psychology’, International Journal of English Studies, 3: 93-109. ( This is a revised version of Potter & Edwards (2001) Sociolinguistics, cognitivism and discursive psychology’. In N. Coupland, S. Sarangi, C. Candlin, eds. Sociolinguistics and Social Theory. London; Longman: 88-103)
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan, Alexa Hepburn (2003) ‘I’m a bit concerned - Early actions and psychological constructions in a child protection helpline’,Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36, 197-240
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan; Alexa Hepburn (2004) ‘Analysis of NSPCC call openings’. In S. Becker, A. Bryman, eds. Understanding research methods for social policy and practice. London; The Policy Press: 311-13.
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan; Alexa Hepburn (2005) ‘Qualitative interviews in psychology: problems and possibilities’, Qualitative research in Psychology, 2, 281-307.
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan; Alexa Hepburn (2005) ‘Action, interaction and interviews – Some responses to Hollway, Mischler and Smith’, Qualitative research in Psychology, 2, 319-325.
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan; Alexa Hepburn (2005) ‘Discursive psychology as a qualitative approach for analysing interaction in medical settings’, Medical Education, 39, 338-344.
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan; Alexa Hepburn (2007) ‘Discursive psychology, institutions and child protection’. In A. Weatherall, B. Watson, C. Gallois, eds. Language and Social Psychology Handbook. London: Palgrave: 160-181.
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan; Alexa Hepburn (2007) ‘Chairing democracy: Psychology, time and negotiating the institution’. In J.P. McDaniel, K. Tracy, eds.The prettier doll: Rhetoric, discourse and ordinary democracy. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press: 176-204.
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan; Alexa Hepburn (2007) ‘Life is out there: a comment on Griffin’, Discourse Studies 9: 276-282
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan, Alexa Hepburn (2008). ‘Discursive constructionism’. In J.A. Holstein, J.F. Gubrium, eds. Handbook of constructionist research. New York: Guildford: 275-293
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan, Alexa Hepburn (2010) ‘A kind of governance: rules, time and psychology in organisations’In: Nick Llewellyn, Jon Hindmarsh, eds. Organisation, interaction and practice: Studies of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 49-73
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan; Alexa Hepburn (2012) ‘Eight challenges for interview researchers’. J.F.
| |
| − | * Gubrium, J.A. Holstein, eds. Handbook of Interview Research (2nd Ed.) . London: Sage: 555-570.
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan, Hedwig te Molder (2005) ‘Talking cognition: Mapping and making the terrain’, in H. te Molder J. Potter (eds) Conversation and Cognition, pp. 1-54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan, Claudia Puchta (2007) ‘Mind, mousse and moderation’. In: Alexa, Hepburn, Sally Wiggins, eds. Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 104-23
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan, Margaret Wetherell (1987) Discourse and social psychology: beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan, Margaret Wetherell (2003) ‘Categories in Discourse’. In J.A. Holstein, J.F. Gubrium, Eds., Inner Lives and Social Worlds. Oxford: Oxford University Press
| |
| − | * Potter, Jonathan, Margaret Wetherell (1988). ‘Accomplishing attitudes: Fact and evaluation in racist discourse’,. Text, 8 (1-2), 51-68.
| |
| − | * Puchta, Claudia, Jonathan Potter, J. (1999). ‘Asking elaborate questions: Focus groups and the management of spontaneity’, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 3, 314-35.
| |
| − | * Puchta, Claudia, Jonathan Potter (2004) Focus Group Practice. London: Sage
| |
| − | * Puchta, Claudia, Jonathan Potter (2002) ‘Manufacturing individual opinions: Market research focus groups and the discursive psychology of attitudes’,British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 345-63
| |
| − | * Puchta, Claudia; Jonathan Potter, Stephan Wolff (2004) ‘Repeat receipts: A device for generating visible data in market research focus groups’, Qualitative Research, 4, 285-309.
| |
| − | * Reynolds, J., & Margaret Wetherell. (2003). ‘The discursive climate of singleness: The consequences for women’s negotiation of a single identity’,Feminism & Psychology, 13, 489-510.
| |
| − | * Seymour-Smith, Sarah; Margaret Wetherell, Ann Phoenix (2002) ‘“My wife ordered me to come!”: A discursive analysis of doctors’ and nurses’ accounts of men’s use of general practitioners’, Journal of Health Psychology 7/3: 253–267
| |
| − | * Smithson, Janet; Siobhan Sharkey et al (2011) ‘Problem presentation and responses on an online forum for young people who self-harm’,Discourse Studies 13/4: 487-501
| |
| − | * Sneijder, Petra (2014) ‘The embedding of reported speech in a rhetorical structure by prosecutors and defense lawyers in Dutch trials’, Text and Talk 32/4: 467-490
| |
| − | * Sneijder, Petra, Hedwig te Molder (2004) "‘Health Should Not Have to be a Problem": Talking Health and Accountability in an Internet Forum on Veganism’, Journal of Health Psychology 9: 599-616
| |
| − | * Sneijder, Petra, Hedwig te Molder (2005) ‘Moral Logic and Logical Morality: Attributions of Responsibility and Blame in Online Discourse on Veganism’,Discourse&Society 16: 675-96
| |
| − | * Speer, Susan A. (2001) ‘Reconsidering the Concept of Hegemonic Masculinity: Discursive Psychology, Conversation Analysis, and Participants’ Orientations’,Feminism and Psychology 11: 107-35
| |
| − | * Speer, Susan A. (2002) ‘“Natural” and “contrived” data: a sustainable distinction?’ Discourse Studies 4: 511-25
| |
| − | * Speer, Susan A. (2002) ‘Transcending the “natural” /“contrived” distinction: a rejoinder to ten Have, Lynch and Potter’, Discourse Studies 4: 543-48
| |
| − | * Speer, Susan A. (2005) Gender Talk: Feminism, Discourse and Conversation Analysis. London & New York: Routledge
| |
| − | * Speer, Susan A., Ian Hutchby (2003 a) ‘From Ethics to Analytics: Aspects of Participants’ Orientations to the Presence and Relevance of Recording Devices’,Sociology 39: 315-37 [see comment: Hammersley (2003) & rejoinder: Speer & Hutchby, 2003 b]
| |
| − | * Speer, Susan A., Ian Hutchby (2003 b) ‘Methodology Needs Analytics: A Rejoinder to Martyn Hammersley’, Sociology 39: 335-59
| |
| − | * Speer, Susan A., Ceri Parsons (2006). ‘Gatekeeping gender: Some features of the use of hypothetical questions in the psychiatric assessment of transsexual patients’. Discourse and Society, 17, 785-812.
| |
| − | * Speer, Susan A., Ceri Parsons (2007) ‘“Suppose it wasn’t possible for you to go any further with treatment, what would you do?” Hypothetical questions in interactions between psychiatrists and transsexual patients’. In: Alexa, Hepburn, Sally Wiggins, eds. Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 182-200
| |
| − | * Speer, Susan A., Jonathan Potter (2002) ’Judith Butler, discursive psychology, and the politics of conversation. In Paul McIlvenny, ed. Talking gender and sexuality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins:151-80
| |
| − | * Speer, Susan, Jonathan Potter (2000) ‘The management of heterosexist talk: Conversational resources and prejudiced claims’, Discourse & Society, 11, 543-72
| |
| − | * Stokoe, Elizabeth H. (1998) ‘Talking about gender: the conversational construction of gender categories in academic discourse. Discourse & Society 9 (2): 217-240
| |
| − | * Stokoe, Elizabeth H. (2000) ‘Constructing topicality in university students’ small-group discussion: A conversation analytic approach’ Language & Education 14(3): 184-203
| |
| − | * Stokoe, Elizabeth.H. (2003) ‘Mothers, Single Women and Sluts: Gender, Morality and Membership Categorisation in Neighbour Disputes’, Feminism and Psychology 13: 317-44
| |
| − | * Stokoe, Elizabeth H. (2004) ‘Gender and discourse, gender and categorization: Current developments in language and gender research’ Qualitative Research in Psychology 1 (2): 107-129
| |
| − | * Stokoe, Elisabeth (2009). ‘Doing actions with identity categories: complaints and denials in neighbor disputes’, Text & Talk, 29, 75-97.
| |
| − | * Stokoe, Elizabeth, Derek Edwards (2006) ‘Story formulations in talk-in-interaction’.Narrative Inquiry 16 (1): 59-68
| |
| − | * Stokoe, Elizabeth, Derek Edwards. (2007) ‘“Black this, black that”: Racial insults and reported speech in neighbour complaints and police interrogations’.Discourse & Society 18 (3): 337-372
| |
| − | * Stokoe, Elizabeth H., Alexa Hepburn (2005) ‘“You can hear a lot through the walls”: Noise formulations in neighbour complaints’, Discourse & Society 16 (5), 647-673 [also in J. Potter, ed., (2007) Discourse and psychology. London: Sage]
| |
| − | * Stokoe, Elizabeth; Alexa Hepburn; Charles Antaki (2012) ‘Beware the ’Loughborough School’ of Social Psychology? Interaction and the politics of intervention’, British Journal of Social Psychology. 51/3, 486-496
| |
| − | * Stokoe, Elizabeth H., J. Wallwork (2003) ’Space invaders: The moral-spatial order in neighbour dispute discourse’, British Journal of Social Psychology42: 551-69
| |
| − | * te Molder, Hedwig (1999) ‘Discourse of Dilemmas: An Analysis of Communication Planners’ Accounts’, British Journal of Social Psychology 38: 245-63
| |
| − | * Tileaga, Cristian (2005) ‘Accounting for Extreme Prejudice and Legitimating Blame in Talk About the Romanies’, Discourse & Society 16: 603-24
| |
| − | * Tuffin, Keith; Christina Howard (2001) ‘Demystifying discourse analysis: theory, method and
| |
| − | * practice’. In: A. McHoul and M. Rapley (eds), How to Analyse Talk in Institutional Settings: A Casebook of Methods. London: Continuum: 196-205
| |
| − | * Van Dijk, Teun A. (2012) ‘A note on epistemics and discourse analysis’, British Journal of Social Psychology. 51/3,
| |
| − | * Vayreda,Agnès; Charles Antaki (2011) ‘To vaccinate or not? The disqualification of commercial sources of health advice in an online forum’, Communication & Medicine, 8/3: 273-282
| |
| − | * Weatherall, Ann (2012) ‘Discursive psychology and feminism’, British Journal of Social Psychology. 51/3, 463-470
| |
| − | * Wetherell, Margaret, Jonathan Potter (1992) Mapping the Language of Racism: Discourse and the Legitimation of Exploitation.Brighton: Harvester/Wheatsheaf
| |
| − | * Wetherell, Margaret, H. Stiven, Jonathan Potter (1987) ‘Unequal Egalitarianism: A Preliminary Study of Discourses Concerning Gender and Employment Opportunities’,British Journal of Social Psychology 27: 59-71
| |
| − | * Wiggins, Sally (2002) ‘Talking With Your Mouth FuJl: Gustatory Mmms and the Embodiment of Pleasure’, Research on Language and Social Interaction35: 311-36
| |
| − | * Wiggins, Sally, Alexa Hepburn (2007) ‘Discursive research: applications and implications’. In: Alexa, Hepburn, Sally Wiggins, eds. Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:281-91
| |
| − | * Wiggins, Sally, Alexa Hepburn (2007) ‘Food abuse: mealtimes, helplines and “troubled” eating’. In: Alexa, Hepburn, Sally Wiggins, eds. Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 263-80
| |
| − | * Wiggins, Sally, Jonathan Potter (2003) ‘Attitudes and evaluative practices: Category vs. item and subjective vs. objective constructions in everyday food assessments’, British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 513-31
| |
| − | * Wilson, M. S., Weatherall, A. Butler, C. (2004) 1\ Rhetorical Approach to Discussions About Health and Vegetarianism’, Journal of Health Psychology9: 567-81
| |
| − | * Wooffitt, Robin (2005) Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis: A Comparative and Critical Introduction. London, etc. Sage Publications
| |
| − | * Wooffitt, Robin (2007) ‘Describing Consciousness: Parapsychology and the Social Organisation of Reports of Mental States’, in A. Hepburn S. Wiggins (eds) Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
| |
| − | * Wooffitt, Robin,. Simon Allistone, S. (2005) ‘Towards a Discursive Parapsychology: Language and the Laboratory Study of Anomalous Communication’. Theory & Psychology 15: 325-355.
| |
