Difference between revisions of "Yu2013"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Changrong Yu | |Author(s)=Changrong Yu | ||
|Title=Two interactional functions of self-mockery in everyday English conversations: A multimodal analysis | |Title=Two interactional functions of self-mockery in everyday English conversations: A multimodal analysis | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Multimodality; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Multimodality; Keywords: Conversational analytical methodology; Embarrassment; Face-saving; Multimodal interaction analysis; Mutual gaze; Off-record markers; Shared amusement; Self-mockery; Verbal and nonverbal expressions |
|Key=Yu2013 | |Key=Yu2013 | ||
|Year=2013 | |Year=2013 | ||
Latest revision as of 07:52, 6 October 2016
| Yu2013 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Yu2013 |
| Author(s) | Changrong Yu |
| Title | Two interactional functions of self-mockery in everyday English conversations: A multimodal analysis |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Multimodality, Keywords: Conversational analytical methodology, Embarrassment, Face-saving, Multimodal interaction analysis, Mutual gaze, Off-record markers, Shared amusement, Self-mockery, Verbal and nonverbal expressions |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2013 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
| Volume | 50 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 1–22 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.01.006 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This paper uses conversation analytical methodology and multimodal interaction analysis to show how self-mockery is conducted via verbal and nonverbal expressions. The author proposes two interactional functions of self-mockery in everyday English conversations. The first function is face-saving. This kind of self-mockery is generally expressed following displays of embarrassment, and it involves admitting one's weaknesses or conversational transgressions in relation to the other speakers. In one type of interactional context, self-mockery saves the speaker's own face by helping to overcome momentary embarrassment. In another interactional context, the speakers use self-mockery to save the face of their recipients, by exposing their own weaknesses in comparison with those of their recipients. In such face-saving situations, the recipients usually disaffiliate with the speaker's self-mockery and try to correct it. The second function of self-mockery is to bring shared amusement to a conversation. In this case, the self-mockers put themselves in a humorous light, coordinating their verbal expressions with exaggerated off-record markers (e.g., gestures or prosodic variations). The recipients often play along with such self-mockery, leading to a series of mutually amusing, jocular exchanges. In all these situations, the return of mutual gaze during the course of self-mockery invites responses from the recipients, and plays an important role for both the interactional function of face recovery and jocular exchanges.
Notes
