Difference between revisions of "Mondada2006c"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
|Pages=117–129 | |Pages=117–129 | ||
| − | |URL= | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461445606059561 |
|DOI=10.1177/1461445606059561 | |DOI=10.1177/1461445606059561 | ||
|Abstract=Studies of talk-and-bodily-conduct-in-interaction have inspired new insights into the way in which language, interaction and cognition might be articulated. More particularly, they have shown that participants mutually orient to the finely tuned multimodal details by which talk and action in interaction are sequentially organized. This article deals with this form of participants' multimodal online analysis' by focusing on a particular phenomenon - the methodical practices and resources by which the end of a turn and of an activity phase is projected and collectively achieved - in a specific videorecorded setting - a meeting in an architect's office. It aims at questioning both how these local orientations are systematically displayed and exploited by the participants for the sequential organization of their activity and how they can be demonstrably observed by the analyst. | |Abstract=Studies of talk-and-bodily-conduct-in-interaction have inspired new insights into the way in which language, interaction and cognition might be articulated. More particularly, they have shown that participants mutually orient to the finely tuned multimodal details by which talk and action in interaction are sequentially organized. This article deals with this form of participants' multimodal online analysis' by focusing on a particular phenomenon - the methodical practices and resources by which the end of a turn and of an activity phase is projected and collectively achieved - in a specific videorecorded setting - a meeting in an architect's office. It aims at questioning both how these local orientations are systematically displayed and exploited by the participants for the sequential organization of their activity and how they can be demonstrably observed by the analyst. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 08:43, 13 November 2019
| Mondada2006c | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Mondada2006c |
| Author(s) | Lorenza Mondada |
| Title | Participants' online analysis and multimodal practices: projecting the end of the turn and the closing of the sequence |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2006 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 8 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 117–129 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445606059561 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Studies of talk-and-bodily-conduct-in-interaction have inspired new insights into the way in which language, interaction and cognition might be articulated. More particularly, they have shown that participants mutually orient to the finely tuned multimodal details by which talk and action in interaction are sequentially organized. This article deals with this form of participants' multimodal online analysis' by focusing on a particular phenomenon - the methodical practices and resources by which the end of a turn and of an activity phase is projected and collectively achieved - in a specific videorecorded setting - a meeting in an architect's office. It aims at questioning both how these local orientations are systematically displayed and exploited by the participants for the sequential organization of their activity and how they can be demonstrably observed by the analyst.
Notes
