Difference between revisions of "Veyrier-Licoppe2015"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Clair-Antoine Veyrier; Christian Licoppe; |Title=Faire apparaître un tiers à l’écran en visiocommunication |Tag(s)=EMCA; Computer...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Clair-Antoine Veyrier; Christian Licoppe; | + | |Author(s)=Clair-Antoine Veyrier; Christian Licoppe; |
| − | |Title=Faire apparaître un tiers à l’écran en visiocommunication | + | |Title=Faire apparaître un tiers à l’écran en visiocommunication |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Computer-mediated Communication; Justice; Courtroom Interaction; Visiocommunication; | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Computer-mediated Communication; Justice; Courtroom Interaction; Visiocommunication; | ||
|Key=Veyrier-Licoppe2015 | |Key=Veyrier-Licoppe2015 | ||
|Year=2015 | |Year=2015 | ||
| + | |Language=French | ||
|Journal=Réseaux | |Journal=Réseaux | ||
| − | |Number=194 | + | |Number=6(194) |
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=169–195 |
| − | |URL= | + | |URL=https://www.cairn.info/revue-reseaux-2015-6-page-169.htm |
|DOI=10.3917/res.194.0169 | |DOI=10.3917/res.194.0169 | ||
| − | | | + | |Note=Bringing a third person onto the screen in video communication |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
The Courts are making increasing use of communication technologies to enable an accused or a witness to appear from a distant location. In video-mediated hearings, the image produced at the opening does not necessarily correspond to the expected framework of participation. For instance, it may not show some participants who play a central part in the hearing, such as the lawyer. This article analyses sequences which “bring forth” the relevant participants who are not visible on the screen, through various processes (e.g. by stating the participative framework, or pointing the participants out on the image). To do so it highlights the tensions between the sequential implications of an appearance, with regard to the course of the hearing. | The Courts are making increasing use of communication technologies to enable an accused or a witness to appear from a distant location. In video-mediated hearings, the image produced at the opening does not necessarily correspond to the expected framework of participation. For instance, it may not show some participants who play a central part in the hearing, such as the lawyer. This article analyses sequences which “bring forth” the relevant participants who are not visible on the screen, through various processes (e.g. by stating the participative framework, or pointing the participants out on the image). To do so it highlights the tensions between the sequential implications of an appearance, with regard to the course of the hearing. | ||
| + | |Abstract=Les tribunaux mobilisent aujourd’hui de plus en plus des technologies de la communication pour permettre par exemple à un prévenu ou un témoin de comparaître à distance. Dans les vidéo-audiences au tribunal, l’image produite à l’ouverture ne correspond pas nécessairement au cadre de participation attendu pour l’activité, par exemple en ce qu’elle ne montre pas des participants appelés à jouer un rôle central dans l’audience, comme l’avocat. L’article analyse les trajectoires séquentielles pour « faire apparaître » par différents procédés (dire le cadre participatif ou montrer à l’image) les participants pertinents non visibles à l’écran, en montrant les tensions entre les implications séquentielles d’une apparition vis-à-vis de la progression de l’activité judiciaire. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 08:32, 13 December 2019
| Veyrier-Licoppe2015 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Veyrier-Licoppe2015 |
| Author(s) | Clair-Antoine Veyrier, Christian Licoppe |
| Title | Faire apparaître un tiers à l’écran en visiocommunication |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Computer-mediated Communication, Justice, Courtroom Interaction, Visiocommunication |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2015 |
| Language | French |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Réseaux |
| Volume | |
| Number | 6(194) |
| Pages | 169–195 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.3917/res.194.0169 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Les tribunaux mobilisent aujourd’hui de plus en plus des technologies de la communication pour permettre par exemple à un prévenu ou un témoin de comparaître à distance. Dans les vidéo-audiences au tribunal, l’image produite à l’ouverture ne correspond pas nécessairement au cadre de participation attendu pour l’activité, par exemple en ce qu’elle ne montre pas des participants appelés à jouer un rôle central dans l’audience, comme l’avocat. L’article analyse les trajectoires séquentielles pour « faire apparaître » par différents procédés (dire le cadre participatif ou montrer à l’image) les participants pertinents non visibles à l’écran, en montrant les tensions entre les implications séquentielles d’une apparition vis-à-vis de la progression de l’activité judiciaire.
Notes
Bringing a third person onto the screen in video communication
The Courts are making increasing use of communication technologies to enable an accused or a witness to appear from a distant location. In video-mediated hearings, the image produced at the opening does not necessarily correspond to the expected framework of participation. For instance, it may not show some participants who play a central part in the hearing, such as the lawyer. This article analyses sequences which “bring forth” the relevant participants who are not visible on the screen, through various processes (e.g. by stating the participative framework, or pointing the participants out on the image). To do so it highlights the tensions between the sequential implications of an appearance, with regard to the course of the hearing.
