Difference between revisions of "Liberman2012"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Kenneth Liberman; | |Author(s)=Kenneth Liberman; | ||
| − | |Title=Semantic | + | |Title=Semantic drift in conversations |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Semantic; Indexical expressions; Reflexivity; Semiotics; Intersubjectivity | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Semantic; Indexical expressions; Reflexivity; Semiotics; Intersubjectivity | ||
|Key=Liberman2012 | |Key=Liberman2012 | ||
Latest revision as of 09:03, 30 November 2019
| Liberman2012 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Liberman2012 |
| Author(s) | Kenneth Liberman |
| Title | Semantic drift in conversations |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Ethnomethodology, Semantic, Indexical expressions, Reflexivity, Semiotics, Intersubjectivity |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2012 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Human Studies |
| Volume | 35 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 263–277 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10746-012-9225-1 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The lability of the meaning of words has been a longstanding topic in ethnomethodology, and this review provides many specific details while analyzing the drift of the sense of words over the course of naturally occurring conversations. Ethnomethodologists do not see equivocality in the meaning of words merely as a problem for members, but they recognize that it is a resource for parties in their organizing the local interaction. Through the use of many concrete illustrations, an account of this pervasive phenomenon makes clear just-how sense develops, evolves over the course of an interaction, and is used to organize the local orderliness. Some ethnomethods used by parties to tame the developing sense for practical purposes are described and analyzed. Especially, the reflexive properties of sense-establishment are identified and described, along with their material details, and the opportunism of parties in taking advantage of the semiotic play of their talk is summarized. Finally, the components of a model for analyzing communication intersubjectively are presented.
Notes
