Difference between revisions of "Housley2011"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=William Housley; Robin James Smith |Title=Mundane Reason, Membership Categorization Practices and the Everyday Ontology of Space and Pla...")
 
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Author(s)=William Housley; Robin James Smith
 
|Author(s)=William Housley; Robin James Smith
|Title=Mundane Reason, Membership Categorization Practices and the Everyday Ontology of Space and Place in Interview Talk
+
|Title=Mundane reason, membership categorization practices and the everyday ontology of space and place in interview talk
 
|Tag(s)=Cardiff Bay; commonsense geography; membership categorization analysis; mundane reason; place; regeneration; space; interview talk
 
|Tag(s)=Cardiff Bay; commonsense geography; membership categorization analysis; mundane reason; place; regeneration; space; interview talk
 
|Key=Housley2011
 
|Key=Housley2011
Line 10: Line 10:
 
|Number=6
 
|Number=6
 
|Pages=698–715
 
|Pages=698–715
|URL=http://qrj.sagepub.com/content/11/6/698
+
|URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1468794111415960
 
|DOI=10.1177/1468794111415960
 
|DOI=10.1177/1468794111415960
 
|Abstract=In this article we aim to utilise and apply ethnomethodological and interactionist principles to the analysis of members’ situated accounts of regenerated urban space. With reference to previous empirical studies we apply membership categorization analysis and the concept of mundane reason to data gathered from situated street level interviews carried out as part of a programme of ethnographic research into the regenerated setting of Cardiff Bay. The article demonstrates that these data yield sociological insight into social actors’ interpretive and interactional reasoning in relation to the negotiation, navigation and comprehension of space and place. Through this work the patterned signatures of the urban interactional order can be identified. Furthermore, we illustrate the forms of emic rationality associated with the everyday and ubiquitous constitution of urban space as a meaningful, and thence cultural, milieu. It is our claim that an appreciation of these urban forms of reasoning is important in the ethnographic, sociological and geographical analysis of space and place.
 
|Abstract=In this article we aim to utilise and apply ethnomethodological and interactionist principles to the analysis of members’ situated accounts of regenerated urban space. With reference to previous empirical studies we apply membership categorization analysis and the concept of mundane reason to data gathered from situated street level interviews carried out as part of a programme of ethnographic research into the regenerated setting of Cardiff Bay. The article demonstrates that these data yield sociological insight into social actors’ interpretive and interactional reasoning in relation to the negotiation, navigation and comprehension of space and place. Through this work the patterned signatures of the urban interactional order can be identified. Furthermore, we illustrate the forms of emic rationality associated with the everyday and ubiquitous constitution of urban space as a meaningful, and thence cultural, milieu. It is our claim that an appreciation of these urban forms of reasoning is important in the ethnographic, sociological and geographical analysis of space and place.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 00:25, 29 November 2019

Housley2011
BibType ARTICLE
Key Housley2011
Author(s) William Housley, Robin James Smith
Title Mundane reason, membership categorization practices and the everyday ontology of space and place in interview talk
Editor(s)
Tag(s) Cardiff Bay, commonsense geography, membership categorization analysis, mundane reason, place, regeneration, space, interview talk
Publisher
Year 2011
Language
City
Month
Journal Qualitative Research
Volume 11
Number 6
Pages 698–715
URL Link
DOI 10.1177/1468794111415960
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

In this article we aim to utilise and apply ethnomethodological and interactionist principles to the analysis of members’ situated accounts of regenerated urban space. With reference to previous empirical studies we apply membership categorization analysis and the concept of mundane reason to data gathered from situated street level interviews carried out as part of a programme of ethnographic research into the regenerated setting of Cardiff Bay. The article demonstrates that these data yield sociological insight into social actors’ interpretive and interactional reasoning in relation to the negotiation, navigation and comprehension of space and place. Through this work the patterned signatures of the urban interactional order can be identified. Furthermore, we illustrate the forms of emic rationality associated with the everyday and ubiquitous constitution of urban space as a meaningful, and thence cultural, milieu. It is our claim that an appreciation of these urban forms of reasoning is important in the ethnographic, sociological and geographical analysis of space and place.

Notes