Difference between revisions of "Helasvuo2004"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Marja-Liisa Helasvuo |Title=Shared Syntax: The Grammar of Co-constructions |Tag(s)=conversation analysis; shared syntax; co-construction...")
 
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Author(s)=Marja-Liisa Helasvuo
 
|Author(s)=Marja-Liisa Helasvuo
|Title=Shared Syntax: The Grammar of Co-constructions
+
|Title=Shared syntax: the grammar of co-constructions
 
|Tag(s)=conversation analysis; shared syntax; co-construction; Finnish; compound TCUs; sentences-in-progress
 
|Tag(s)=conversation analysis; shared syntax; co-construction; Finnish; compound TCUs; sentences-in-progress
 
|Key=Helasvuo2004
 
|Key=Helasvuo2004
 
|Year=2004
 
|Year=2004
 
|Journal=Journal of Pragmatics
 
|Journal=Journal of Pragmatics
|Booktitle=36
+
|Volume=38
|Volume=8
+
|Number=8
|Number=1315–1336
+
|Pages=1315–1336
|Pages=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216604001134
+
|URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378216604001134
|URL=10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.007
+
|DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.007
 
|Abstract=This paper focuses on co-constructions, i.e., clauses that are produced collaboratively by the conversation participants (see Sacks, 1992: 647–655; Lerner, 1991, 1994, 1996; Ono and Thompson, 1996). More specifically, the paper looks at completions that involve the co-construction of one clause. The data for the study come from Finnish, and offer an interesting perspective on the phenomenon, as Finnish is a language with rich inflectional morphology. Each item in the clause is inflected in a form that shows its function in the clause. This means that in a completion, the form of each item in both the preliminary and final part is controlled by the emerging unit as a whole. Completions are shown to occur at different syntactic levels, both at constituent boundaries and also within constituents (e.g., within a noun phrase) and even within lexical units. The conclusion is that syntax is shared and jointly produced, from the smallest units up to larger sequences.
 
|Abstract=This paper focuses on co-constructions, i.e., clauses that are produced collaboratively by the conversation participants (see Sacks, 1992: 647–655; Lerner, 1991, 1994, 1996; Ono and Thompson, 1996). More specifically, the paper looks at completions that involve the co-construction of one clause. The data for the study come from Finnish, and offer an interesting perspective on the phenomenon, as Finnish is a language with rich inflectional morphology. Each item in the clause is inflected in a form that shows its function in the clause. This means that in a completion, the form of each item in both the preliminary and final part is controlled by the emerging unit as a whole. Completions are shown to occur at different syntactic levels, both at constituent boundaries and also within constituents (e.g., within a noun phrase) and even within lexical units. The conclusion is that syntax is shared and jointly produced, from the smallest units up to larger sequences.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 03:36, 1 November 2019

Helasvuo2004
BibType ARTICLE
Key Helasvuo2004
Author(s) Marja-Liisa Helasvuo
Title Shared syntax: the grammar of co-constructions
Editor(s)
Tag(s) conversation analysis, shared syntax, co-construction, Finnish, compound TCUs, sentences-in-progress
Publisher
Year 2004
Language
City
Month
Journal Journal of Pragmatics
Volume 38
Number 8
Pages 1315–1336
URL Link
DOI 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.007
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This paper focuses on co-constructions, i.e., clauses that are produced collaboratively by the conversation participants (see Sacks, 1992: 647–655; Lerner, 1991, 1994, 1996; Ono and Thompson, 1996). More specifically, the paper looks at completions that involve the co-construction of one clause. The data for the study come from Finnish, and offer an interesting perspective on the phenomenon, as Finnish is a language with rich inflectional morphology. Each item in the clause is inflected in a form that shows its function in the clause. This means that in a completion, the form of each item in both the preliminary and final part is controlled by the emerging unit as a whole. Completions are shown to occur at different syntactic levels, both at constituent boundaries and also within constituents (e.g., within a noun phrase) and even within lexical units. The conclusion is that syntax is shared and jointly produced, from the smallest units up to larger sequences.

Notes