Difference between revisions of "Ferrie2004"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Jean-Noël Ferrié; Baudouin Dupret |Title=Préférences et Pertinences: Analyse Praxéologique des Figures du Compromis en Contexte Par...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Jean-Noël Ferrié; Baudouin Dupret | |Author(s)=Jean-Noël Ferrié; Baudouin Dupret | ||
− | |Title=Préférences et | + | |Title=Préférences et pertinences: analyse praxéologique des figures du compromis en contexte parlementaire. A propos d'un débat Égyptien |
|Tag(s)=compromise; ethnomethodology; hearings; parliament; Egypt | |Tag(s)=compromise; ethnomethodology; hearings; parliament; Egypt | ||
|Key=Ferrie2004 | |Key=Ferrie2004 | ||
|Year=2004 | |Year=2004 | ||
+ | |Language=French | ||
|Journal=Social Science Information | |Journal=Social Science Information | ||
|Volume=43 | |Volume=43 | ||
|Number=2 | |Number=2 | ||
|Pages=263–290 | |Pages=263–290 | ||
− | |URL= | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0539018404042582 |
|DOI=10.1177/0539018404042582 | |DOI=10.1177/0539018404042582 | ||
|Abstract=Taking as its departure point an Egyptian parliamentary debate, this article shows, first of all, that rational-choice theory cannot describe the making of a compromise; and, second, that the re-appraisal of preferences does not imply a change of opinion after the debate. It argues instead that the praxeological approach is more suitable for describing this dynamic. | |Abstract=Taking as its departure point an Egyptian parliamentary debate, this article shows, first of all, that rational-choice theory cannot describe the making of a compromise; and, second, that the re-appraisal of preferences does not imply a change of opinion after the debate. It argues instead that the praxeological approach is more suitable for describing this dynamic. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 04:56, 1 November 2019
Ferrie2004 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Ferrie2004 |
Author(s) | Jean-Noël Ferrié, Baudouin Dupret |
Title | Préférences et pertinences: analyse praxéologique des figures du compromis en contexte parlementaire. A propos d'un débat Égyptien |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | compromise, ethnomethodology, hearings, parliament, Egypt |
Publisher | |
Year | 2004 |
Language | French |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Social Science Information |
Volume | 43 |
Number | 2 |
Pages | 263–290 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1177/0539018404042582 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
Taking as its departure point an Egyptian parliamentary debate, this article shows, first of all, that rational-choice theory cannot describe the making of a compromise; and, second, that the re-appraisal of preferences does not imply a change of opinion after the debate. It argues instead that the praxeological approach is more suitable for describing this dynamic.
Notes