Difference between revisions of "Burke2008"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Shaunna Burke; Andrew C. Sparkes; Jacquelyn Allen-Collinson |Title=High Altitude Climbers as Ethnomethodologists Making Sense of Cogniti...")
 
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Author(s)=Shaunna Burke; Andrew C. Sparkes; Jacquelyn Allen-Collinson
 
|Author(s)=Shaunna Burke; Andrew C. Sparkes; Jacquelyn Allen-Collinson
|Title=High Altitude Climbers as Ethnomethodologists Making Sense of Cognitive Dissonance: Ethnographic Insights From an Attempt to Scale Mt. Everest
+
|Title=High altitude climbers as ethnomethodologists making sense of cognitive dissonance: ethnographic insights from an attempt to scale Mt. Everest
 
|Tag(s)=Ethnomethodology; High Altitude Climbers; Cognitive Dissonance
 
|Tag(s)=Ethnomethodology; High Altitude Climbers; Cognitive Dissonance
 
|Key=Burke2008
 
|Key=Burke2008
 
|Year=2008
 
|Year=2008
|Journal=Sport Psychology
+
|Journal=Sport Psychologist
 
|Volume=22
 
|Volume=22
 
|Number=3
 
|Number=3
 
|Pages=336–355
 
|Pages=336–355
|URL=http://journals.humankinetics.com/tsp-back-issues/tspvolume22issue3september/highaltitudeclimbersasethnomethodologistsmakingsenseofcognitivedissonanceethnographicinsightsfromanattempttoscalemteverest
+
|URL=https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/tsp/22/3/article-p336.xml
 +
|DOI=10.1123/tsp.22.3.336
 
|Abstract=This ethnographic study examined how a group of high altitude climbers (N = 6) drew on ethnomethodological principles (the documentary method of interpreta­tion, reflexivity, indexicality, and membership) to interpret their experiences of cognitive dissonance during an attempt to scale Mt. Everest. Data were collected via participant observation, interviews, and a field diary. Each data source was subjected to a content mode of analysis. Results revealed how cognitive disso­nance reduction is accomplished from within the interaction between a pattern of self-justification and self-inconsistencies; how the reflexive nature of cognitive dissonance is experienced; how specific features of the setting are inextricably linked to the cognitive dissonance experience; and how climbers draw upon a shared stock of knowledge in their experiences with cognitive dissonance.
 
|Abstract=This ethnographic study examined how a group of high altitude climbers (N = 6) drew on ethnomethodological principles (the documentary method of interpreta­tion, reflexivity, indexicality, and membership) to interpret their experiences of cognitive dissonance during an attempt to scale Mt. Everest. Data were collected via participant observation, interviews, and a field diary. Each data source was subjected to a content mode of analysis. Results revealed how cognitive disso­nance reduction is accomplished from within the interaction between a pattern of self-justification and self-inconsistencies; how the reflexive nature of cognitive dissonance is experienced; how specific features of the setting are inextricably linked to the cognitive dissonance experience; and how climbers draw upon a shared stock of knowledge in their experiences with cognitive dissonance.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 01:26, 21 November 2019

Burke2008
BibType ARTICLE
Key Burke2008
Author(s) Shaunna Burke, Andrew C. Sparkes, Jacquelyn Allen-Collinson
Title High altitude climbers as ethnomethodologists making sense of cognitive dissonance: ethnographic insights from an attempt to scale Mt. Everest
Editor(s)
Tag(s) Ethnomethodology, High Altitude Climbers, Cognitive Dissonance
Publisher
Year 2008
Language
City
Month
Journal Sport Psychologist
Volume 22
Number 3
Pages 336–355
URL Link
DOI 10.1123/tsp.22.3.336
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This ethnographic study examined how a group of high altitude climbers (N = 6) drew on ethnomethodological principles (the documentary method of interpreta­tion, reflexivity, indexicality, and membership) to interpret their experiences of cognitive dissonance during an attempt to scale Mt. Everest. Data were collected via participant observation, interviews, and a field diary. Each data source was subjected to a content mode of analysis. Results revealed how cognitive disso­nance reduction is accomplished from within the interaction between a pattern of self-justification and self-inconsistencies; how the reflexive nature of cognitive dissonance is experienced; how specific features of the setting are inextricably linked to the cognitive dissonance experience; and how climbers draw upon a shared stock of knowledge in their experiences with cognitive dissonance.

Notes