Difference between revisions of "Hilbert89"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Richard A. Hilbert; |Title=Durkheim and Merton on Anomie: An Unexplored Contrast and Its Derivatives |Tag(s)=EMCA; Social Theory; Anomie...")
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Author(s)=Richard A. Hilbert;
 
|Author(s)=Richard A. Hilbert;
|Title=Durkheim and Merton on Anomie: An Unexplored Contrast and Its Derivatives
+
|Title=Durkheim and Merton on anomie: an unexplored contrast and its derivatives
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Social Theory; Anomie; Durkheim; Merton;
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Social Theory; Anomie; Durkheim; Merton;
 
|Key=Hilbert89
 
|Key=Hilbert89
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|Volume=36
 
|Volume=36
 
|Number=3
 
|Number=3
|Pages=242-250
+
|Pages=242–250
|Abstract=Combining the anomie theories of Durkheim and Merton yields: anomie prevents anomie. This incoherence indicates that the theorists cannot be referencing the same phenomenon. Differences are pursued in the assumptions and orientations of the two theorists, particularly the ontological status of deviance, the role it plays in the health of society and the sense in which it is normal, the nature of a crisis, the formal relationship between deviance and anomie, and the similarities in theoretical outcomes to those of common sense reasoning. Durkheim's theory emerges as more compatible with labeling theory, ethnomethodology, and contemporary social problems theory than with American functionalism. Merton's theorizing emerges as an empirical example of Durkheimian ritual anomie prevention practices.  
+
|URL=https://academic.oup.com/socpro/article-abstract/36/3/242/2925222
 +
|DOI=10.2307/800693
 +
|Abstract=Combining the anomie theories of Durkheim and Merton yields: anomie prevents anomie. This incoherence indicates that the theorists cannot be referencing the same phenomenon. Differences are pursued in the assumptions and orientations of the two theorists, particularly the ontological status of deviance, the role it plays in the health of society and the sense in which it is normal, the nature of a crisis, the formal relationship between deviance and anomie, and the similarities in theoretical outcomes to those of common sense reasoning. Durkheim s theory emerges as more compatible with labeling theory, ethnomethodology, and contemporary social problems theory than with American functionalism. Merton s theorizing emerges as an empirical example of Durkheimian ritual anomie prevention practices.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 10:27, 21 October 2019

Hilbert89
BibType ARTICLE
Key Hilbert89
Author(s) Richard A. Hilbert
Title Durkheim and Merton on anomie: an unexplored contrast and its derivatives
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Social Theory, Anomie, Durkheim, Merton
Publisher
Year 1989
Language
City
Month
Journal Social Problems
Volume 36
Number 3
Pages 242–250
URL Link
DOI 10.2307/800693
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Combining the anomie theories of Durkheim and Merton yields: anomie prevents anomie. This incoherence indicates that the theorists cannot be referencing the same phenomenon. Differences are pursued in the assumptions and orientations of the two theorists, particularly the ontological status of deviance, the role it plays in the health of society and the sense in which it is normal, the nature of a crisis, the formal relationship between deviance and anomie, and the similarities in theoretical outcomes to those of common sense reasoning. Durkheim s theory emerges as more compatible with labeling theory, ethnomethodology, and contemporary social problems theory than with American functionalism. Merton s theorizing emerges as an empirical example of Durkheimian ritual anomie prevention practices.

Notes