Difference between revisions of "Heritage-Raymond2016"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=John Heritage; Chase Wesley Raymond; |Title=Are explicit apologies proportional to the offenses they address? |Tag(s)=EMCA; Apologies...") |
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) m (SaulAlbert moved page Heritage-Raymond2015 to Heritage-Raymond2016 without leaving a redirect) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=John Heritage; Chase Wesley Raymond; | + | |Author(s)=John Heritage; Chase Wesley Raymond; |
|Title=Are explicit apologies proportional to the offenses they address? | |Title=Are explicit apologies proportional to the offenses they address? | ||
| − | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Apologies; Goffman; | |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Apologies; Goffman; | + | |Key=Heritage-Raymond2016 |
| − | |Key=Heritage- | + | |Year=2016 |
| − | |Year= | ||
|Journal=Discourse Processes | |Journal=Discourse Processes | ||
| + | |Volume=53 | ||
| + | |Number=1-2 | ||
| + | |Pages=5-25 | ||
|URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1056695 | |URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1056695 | ||
|DOI=10.1080/0163853X.2015.1056695 | |DOI=10.1080/0163853X.2015.1056695 | ||
| − | |||
|Abstract=In this paper, we consider Goffman's proposal of proportionality between virtual offenses and remedial actions, based on the examination of 102 cases of explicit apologies. To this end, we offer a typology of the primary apology formats within the dataset, together with a broad categorization of the types of virtual offenses to which these apologies are addressed. We find a broad proportionality between apologies and the offenses they remediate when the offenses to be remediated are minor, however this relationship is not sustained among larger apologies and offenses. In the latter cases, relational and contextual contingencies are important intervening factors influencing apology construction. | |Abstract=In this paper, we consider Goffman's proposal of proportionality between virtual offenses and remedial actions, based on the examination of 102 cases of explicit apologies. To this end, we offer a typology of the primary apology formats within the dataset, together with a broad categorization of the types of virtual offenses to which these apologies are addressed. We find a broad proportionality between apologies and the offenses they remediate when the offenses to be remediated are minor, however this relationship is not sustained among larger apologies and offenses. In the latter cases, relational and contextual contingencies are important intervening factors influencing apology construction. | ||
| − | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:17, 15 May 2016
| Heritage-Raymond2016 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Heritage-Raymond2016 |
| Author(s) | John Heritage, Chase Wesley Raymond |
| Title | Are explicit apologies proportional to the offenses they address? |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Apologies, Goffman |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2016 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Processes |
| Volume | 53 |
| Number | 1-2 |
| Pages | 5-25 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/0163853X.2015.1056695 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In this paper, we consider Goffman's proposal of proportionality between virtual offenses and remedial actions, based on the examination of 102 cases of explicit apologies. To this end, we offer a typology of the primary apology formats within the dataset, together with a broad categorization of the types of virtual offenses to which these apologies are addressed. We find a broad proportionality between apologies and the offenses they remediate when the offenses to be remediated are minor, however this relationship is not sustained among larger apologies and offenses. In the latter cases, relational and contextual contingencies are important intervening factors influencing apology construction.
Notes
