Difference between revisions of "Clayman2002"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| − | |BibType= | + | |BibType=INCOLLECTION |
|Author(s)=Steven E. Clayman; | |Author(s)=Steven E. Clayman; | ||
|Title=Sequence and solidarity | |Title=Sequence and solidarity | ||
| + | |Editor(s)=Shane R. Thye; Edward J. Lawler | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Affiliation; Sequence organization; | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Affiliation; Sequence organization; | ||
|Key=Clayman2002 | |Key=Clayman2002 | ||
| + | |Publisher=Emerald Group | ||
|Year=2002 | |Year=2002 | ||
| − | | | + | |Address=Bingley |
| − | | | + | |Booktitle=Group Cohesion, Trust and Solidarity |
|Pages=229–253 | |Pages=229–253 | ||
| − | |URL= | + | |URL=https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1016/S0882-6145(02)19009-6/full/html |
| + | |DOI=10.1016/S0882-6145(02)19009-6 | ||
|ISBN=0762308982 | |ISBN=0762308982 | ||
| + | |Series=Advances in Group Processes | ||
| + | |Abstract=This paper develops a conversation analytic perspective on social solidarity, focusing on the organized practices through which solidary relations are maintained within interaction. Previous research on preference organization is reviewed and synthesized, and it is demonstrated that this robust mode of organization tends to suppress discordant actions while promoting solidary actions. The suppression of discordant actions involves practices that: (1) mitigate such actions, as well as; (2) minimize the likelihood of their occurrence. Conversely, solidary actions tend to be: (1) not mitigated; and (2) delivered in ways that maximize the likelihood of their occurrence. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:55, 30 October 2019
| Clayman2002 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Clayman2002 |
| Author(s) | Steven E. Clayman |
| Title | Sequence and solidarity |
| Editor(s) | Shane R. Thye, Edward J. Lawler |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Affiliation, Sequence organization |
| Publisher | Emerald Group |
| Year | 2002 |
| Language | |
| City | Bingley |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 229–253 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/S0882-6145(02)19009-6 |
| ISBN | 0762308982 |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | Advances in Group Processes |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Group Cohesion, Trust and Solidarity |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This paper develops a conversation analytic perspective on social solidarity, focusing on the organized practices through which solidary relations are maintained within interaction. Previous research on preference organization is reviewed and synthesized, and it is demonstrated that this robust mode of organization tends to suppress discordant actions while promoting solidary actions. The suppression of discordant actions involves practices that: (1) mitigate such actions, as well as; (2) minimize the likelihood of their occurrence. Conversely, solidary actions tend to be: (1) not mitigated; and (2) delivered in ways that maximize the likelihood of their occurrence.
Notes
