Difference between revisions of "Buscher2006"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Monika Büscher; |Title=Vision in motion |Tag(s)=EMCA; Place; Mobility; Materiality |Key=Buscher2006 |Year=2006 |Journal=Environment an...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Monika Büscher; | + | |Author(s)=Monika Büscher; |
|Title=Vision in motion | |Title=Vision in motion | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Place; Mobility; Materiality | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Place; Mobility; Materiality | ||
|Key=Buscher2006 | |Key=Buscher2006 | ||
|Year=2006 | |Year=2006 | ||
| − | |Journal=Environment and Planning A | + | |Journal=Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space |
|Volume=38 | |Volume=38 | ||
|Number=2 | |Number=2 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=281–299 |
| − | |URL= | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a37277 |
| − | |Abstract=Mobility and materiality are pervasive and revealing features of professional | + | |DOI=10.1068/a37277 |
| − | vision. In this paper I examine how landscape architects assess visual and | + | |Abstract=Mobility and materiality are pervasive and revealing features of professional vision. In this paper I examine how landscape architects assess visual and landscape effects of proposed urban or rural developments. A focus on mobility and materiality reveals a struggle for objectivity and transparency, and the lived reality of Latour's observation that “we have never been modern”. But it also highlights the emergence of new forms of perception and epistemic practice. Based on work with landscape architects and computer scientists in participatory technology research and design projects, I present an analysis of current practices and some observations on emerging future practices of appreciating and shaping places. |
| − | landscape effects of proposed urban or rural developments. A focus on mobility and | ||
| − | materiality reveals a struggle for objectivity and transparency, and the lived reality | ||
| − | of | ||
| − | the emergence of new forms of perception and epistemic practice. Based on | ||
| − | work with landscape architects and computer scientists in participatory technology | ||
| − | research and design projects, I present an analysis of current practices and some observations | ||
| − | on emerging future practices of appreciating and shaping places. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:21, 13 November 2019
| Buscher2006 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Buscher2006 |
| Author(s) | Monika Büscher |
| Title | Vision in motion |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Place, Mobility, Materiality |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2006 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space |
| Volume | 38 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 281–299 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1068/a37277 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Mobility and materiality are pervasive and revealing features of professional vision. In this paper I examine how landscape architects assess visual and landscape effects of proposed urban or rural developments. A focus on mobility and materiality reveals a struggle for objectivity and transparency, and the lived reality of Latour's observation that “we have never been modern”. But it also highlights the emergence of new forms of perception and epistemic practice. Based on work with landscape architects and computer scientists in participatory technology research and design projects, I present an analysis of current practices and some observations on emerging future practices of appreciating and shaping places.
Notes
