Difference between revisions of "Bilmes2011"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Jack Bilmes; |Title=Occasioned semantics: A systematic approach to meaning in talk |Tag(s)=EMCA; Semantics; Conversation Analysis; |Ke...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Jack Bilmes; | + | |Author(s)=Jack Bilmes; |
|Title=Occasioned semantics: A systematic approach to meaning in talk | |Title=Occasioned semantics: A systematic approach to meaning in talk | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Semantics; Conversation Analysis; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Semantics; Conversation Analysis; |
|Key=Bilmes2011 | |Key=Bilmes2011 | ||
|Year=2011 | |Year=2011 | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Volume=34 | |Volume=34 | ||
|Number=2 | |Number=2 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=155–181 |
| − | |URL= | + | |URL=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10746-011-9183-z |
| + | |DOI=10.1007/s10746-011-9183-z | ||
|Abstract=This paper puts forward an argument for a systematic, technical approach to formulation in verbal interaction. I see this as a kind of expansion of Sacks’ membership categorization analysis, and as something that is not offered (at least not in a fully developed form) by sequential analysis, the currently dominant form of conversation analysis. In particular, I suggest a technique for the study of “occasioned semantics,” that is, the study of structures of meaningful expressions in actual occasions of conversation. I propose that meaning and rhetoric be approached through consideration of various dimensions or operations or properties, including, but not limited to, contrast and co-categorization, generalization and specification, scaling, and marking. As illustration, I consider a variety of cases, focused on generalization and specification. The paper can be seen as a return to some classical concerns with meaning, as illuminated by more recent insights into indexicality, social action, and interaction in recorded talk. | |Abstract=This paper puts forward an argument for a systematic, technical approach to formulation in verbal interaction. I see this as a kind of expansion of Sacks’ membership categorization analysis, and as something that is not offered (at least not in a fully developed form) by sequential analysis, the currently dominant form of conversation analysis. In particular, I suggest a technique for the study of “occasioned semantics,” that is, the study of structures of meaningful expressions in actual occasions of conversation. I propose that meaning and rhetoric be approached through consideration of various dimensions or operations or properties, including, but not limited to, contrast and co-categorization, generalization and specification, scaling, and marking. As illustration, I consider a variety of cases, focused on generalization and specification. The paper can be seen as a return to some classical concerns with meaning, as illuminated by more recent insights into indexicality, social action, and interaction in recorded talk. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:12, 29 November 2019
| Bilmes2011 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Bilmes2011 |
| Author(s) | Jack Bilmes |
| Title | Occasioned semantics: A systematic approach to meaning in talk |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Semantics, Conversation Analysis |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2011 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Human Studies |
| Volume | 34 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 155–181 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10746-011-9183-z |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This paper puts forward an argument for a systematic, technical approach to formulation in verbal interaction. I see this as a kind of expansion of Sacks’ membership categorization analysis, and as something that is not offered (at least not in a fully developed form) by sequential analysis, the currently dominant form of conversation analysis. In particular, I suggest a technique for the study of “occasioned semantics,” that is, the study of structures of meaningful expressions in actual occasions of conversation. I propose that meaning and rhetoric be approached through consideration of various dimensions or operations or properties, including, but not limited to, contrast and co-categorization, generalization and specification, scaling, and marking. As illustration, I consider a variety of cases, focused on generalization and specification. The paper can be seen as a return to some classical concerns with meaning, as illuminated by more recent insights into indexicality, social action, and interaction in recorded talk.
Notes
