Difference between revisions of "LesterGabriel2014"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Jessica Nina Lester; Rachael Gabriel | |Author(s)=Jessica Nina Lester; Rachael Gabriel | ||
|Title=The discursive construction of intelligence in introductory educational psychology textbooks | |Title=The discursive construction of intelligence in introductory educational psychology textbooks | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=Discursive Psychology; Education; Text; | + | |Tag(s)=Discursive Psychology; Education; Text; |
|Key=LesterGabriel2014 | |Key=LesterGabriel2014 | ||
|Year=2014 | |Year=2014 | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Volume=16 | |Volume=16 | ||
|Number=6 | |Number=6 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=776–791 |
| − | |URL= | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461445614546250 |
|DOI=10.1177/1461445614546250 | |DOI=10.1177/1461445614546250 | ||
| + | |Abstract=The meaning(s) of intelligence has varied across time and place, with these varied constructions holding consequences for people and society at large. There is, however, little consensus around what intelligence actually means and how the construct should be applied. Educational discourses, including textbooks used to train teachers, have commonly been the site for the dissemination of ‘authoritative’ information surrounding intelligence. In this article, we present findings from a discourse analysis informed by discursive psychology of passages related to defining and measuring intelligence taken from 10 educational psychology textbooks designed for university students studying to become teachers. Our research question was: How is the dilemmatic nature of the construct of intelligence managed in introductory educational psychology textbooks at the level of discourse? We discuss the function of sequencing and topic displays and how the textbook authors navigated the ideological dilemmas surrounding the construct of intelligence. We conclude by pointing to the implications for teacher training and the importance of social constructionist projects that place into question presumably ‘real’ psychological constructs. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 08:42, 9 December 2019
| LesterGabriel2014 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | LesterGabriel2014 |
| Author(s) | Jessica Nina Lester, Rachael Gabriel |
| Title | The discursive construction of intelligence in introductory educational psychology textbooks |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | Discursive Psychology, Education, Text |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2014 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 16 |
| Number | 6 |
| Pages | 776–791 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445614546250 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The meaning(s) of intelligence has varied across time and place, with these varied constructions holding consequences for people and society at large. There is, however, little consensus around what intelligence actually means and how the construct should be applied. Educational discourses, including textbooks used to train teachers, have commonly been the site for the dissemination of ‘authoritative’ information surrounding intelligence. In this article, we present findings from a discourse analysis informed by discursive psychology of passages related to defining and measuring intelligence taken from 10 educational psychology textbooks designed for university students studying to become teachers. Our research question was: How is the dilemmatic nature of the construct of intelligence managed in introductory educational psychology textbooks at the level of discourse? We discuss the function of sequencing and topic displays and how the textbook authors navigated the ideological dilemmas surrounding the construct of intelligence. We conclude by pointing to the implications for teacher training and the importance of social constructionist projects that place into question presumably ‘real’ psychological constructs.
Notes
