Difference between revisions of "Beeke2007"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Suzanne Beeke; Jane Maxim; Ray Wilkinson; |Title=Using conversation analysis to assess and treat people with aphasia |Tag(s)=Conversati...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Suzanne Beeke; Jane Maxim; Ray Wilkinson; | + | |Author(s)=Suzanne Beeke; Jane Maxim; Ray Wilkinson; |
|Title=Using conversation analysis to assess and treat people with aphasia | |Title=Using conversation analysis to assess and treat people with aphasia | ||
|Tag(s)=Conversation Analysis; Methodology; Aphasia | |Tag(s)=Conversation Analysis; Methodology; Aphasia | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Volume=28 | |Volume=28 | ||
|Number=2 | |Number=2 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=136–147 |
| + | |URL=https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-2007-970571 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1055/s-2007-970571 | ||
| + | |Abstract=This article gives an overview of the application to aphasia of conversation analysis (CA), a qualitative methodology for the analysis of recorded, naturally occurring talk produced in everyday human interaction. CA, like pragmatics, considers language use in context, but it differs from other analytical frameworks because the clinician is not making interpretations about how an aspect of language should be coded or judging whether an utterance is successful or adequate in terms of communication. We first outline the CA methodology before discussing its application to the assessment of aphasia, principally through the use of two published assessment tools. We then move on to illustrate applications of CA in the field of aphasia therapy by discussing two single case study interventions. Key conversation behaviors are illustrated with transcripts from interactions recorded by the person with aphasia and the person's habitual conversation partner in the home environment. Finally, we explore the implications of using CA as a tool for assessment and treatment in aphasia. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:16, 19 November 2019
| Beeke2007 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Beeke2007 |
| Author(s) | Suzanne Beeke, Jane Maxim, Ray Wilkinson |
| Title | Using conversation analysis to assess and treat people with aphasia |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | Conversation Analysis, Methodology, Aphasia |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2007 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Seminars in Speech and Language |
| Volume | 28 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 136–147 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1055/s-2007-970571 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article gives an overview of the application to aphasia of conversation analysis (CA), a qualitative methodology for the analysis of recorded, naturally occurring talk produced in everyday human interaction. CA, like pragmatics, considers language use in context, but it differs from other analytical frameworks because the clinician is not making interpretations about how an aspect of language should be coded or judging whether an utterance is successful or adequate in terms of communication. We first outline the CA methodology before discussing its application to the assessment of aphasia, principally through the use of two published assessment tools. We then move on to illustrate applications of CA in the field of aphasia therapy by discussing two single case study interventions. Key conversation behaviors are illustrated with transcripts from interactions recorded by the person with aphasia and the person's habitual conversation partner in the home environment. Finally, we explore the implications of using CA as a tool for assessment and treatment in aphasia.
Notes
