Difference between revisions of "Beach1997"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Wayne A. Beach; Terri R. Metzger |Title=Claiming insufficient knowledge |Tag(s)=Conversation Analysis; Knowledge; "I don't know" |Key=Be...")
 
m
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|Author(s)=Wayne A. Beach; Terri R. Metzger
 
|Author(s)=Wayne A. Beach; Terri R. Metzger
 
|Title=Claiming insufficient knowledge
 
|Title=Claiming insufficient knowledge
|Tag(s)=Conversation Analysis; Knowledge; "I don't know"
+
|Tag(s)=Conversation Analysis; Knowledge; "I don't know"; Epistemic disclaimers
|Key=Beach 1997
+
|Key=Beach1997
 
|Year=1997
 
|Year=1997
 +
|Language=English
 
|Journal=Human Communication Research
 
|Journal=Human Communication Research
 
|Volume=23
 
|Volume=23
Line 11: Line 12:
 
|Pages=562-588
 
|Pages=562-588
 
|URL=http://sonmedialab.sdsu.edu/~wbeach/claiming_insufficient_knowledge.pdf
 
|URL=http://sonmedialab.sdsu.edu/~wbeach/claiming_insufficient_knowledge.pdf
 +
|Abstract=When speakers produce “I don’t  knows”  in ordinary conversation,  they claim  insufficient knowledge about  the matters at hand.  Analysis  of  diverse conversational  environments  reveal, however, that speakers‘ claims nevertheless accomplish a variety of subtle actions. “I don‘t knows” may be strategically  and ambiguously  deployed across  the following  achievements:  (a) marking uncertainty  and  concerns about next-positioned opinions, assessments, or troubles; (b)  constructing neutral  positions, designed  to mitigate agreement and  disagreement, by disattending  and  seeking closure on  other-initiated  topics (e.g., moving toward completing stories or  working to avoid  troubling issues);  and  (c)  postponing or withholding acceptance of others’ invited and requested actions. By examining  moments where  insufficient  knowledge claims  are contingently  used as  a resource,  understandings  of proactive  yet delicately managed interactional conduct are forwarded. Such  conduct  is shown to be  anchored  in ordinary conversations but adapted in  similar  yet distinct ways within  institutional  interactions such
 +
as courtroom cross-examination.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 05:25, 19 November 2018

Beach1997
BibType ARTICLE
Key Beach1997
Author(s) Wayne A. Beach, Terri R. Metzger
Title Claiming insufficient knowledge
Editor(s)
Tag(s) Conversation Analysis, Knowledge, "I don't know", Epistemic disclaimers
Publisher
Year 1997
Language English
City
Month
Journal Human Communication Research
Volume 23
Number 4
Pages 562-588
URL Link
DOI
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

When speakers produce “I don’t knows” in ordinary conversation, they claim insufficient knowledge about the matters at hand. Analysis of diverse conversational environments reveal, however, that speakers‘ claims nevertheless accomplish a variety of subtle actions. “I don‘t knows” may be strategically and ambiguously deployed across the following achievements: (a) marking uncertainty and concerns about next-positioned opinions, assessments, or troubles; (b) constructing neutral positions, designed to mitigate agreement and disagreement, by disattending and seeking closure on other-initiated topics (e.g., moving toward completing stories or working to avoid troubling issues); and (c) postponing or withholding acceptance of others’ invited and requested actions. By examining moments where insufficient knowledge claims are contingently used as a resource, understandings of proactive yet delicately managed interactional conduct are forwarded. Such conduct is shown to be anchored in ordinary conversations but adapted in similar yet distinct ways within institutional interactions such as courtroom cross-examination.

Notes