Difference between revisions of "Sidnell2012c"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) m (SaulAlbert moved page Sidnel2012b to Sidnell2012c without leaving a redirect: Name Sidnell misspelled in page title) |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Jack Sidnell; | + | |Author(s)=Jack Sidnell; |
|Title=Turn-continuation by self and by other | |Title=Turn-continuation by self and by other | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Turn Construction; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Turn Construction; Turncontinuation; |
| − | |Key= | + | |Key=Sidnell2012c |
|Year=2012 | |Year=2012 | ||
|Journal=Discourse Processes | |Journal=Discourse Processes | ||
|Volume=49 | |Volume=49 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Number=3-4 |
| + | |Pages=314–337 | ||
| + | |URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0163853X.2012.654760 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1080/0163853X.2012.654760 | ||
| + | |Abstract=At the possible completion of a turn constructional unit (TCU) that has not selected a next speaker, a speaker has two available options: either begin a new TCU or continue the one that has just come to a point of possible completion. This article describes some of the complex turns that result from exercising the second option. These can be seen to consist of at least two components: a host and a continuation. This article focuses, in particular, on cases in which these are produced by different speakers. Although a basic distinction between reverse- and same-directionality continuations can account for many instances, other cases are more complicated. This article suggests that such cases encourage us to consider the variety of footings a speaker can adopt vis-à-vis the prior talk by continuing another participant's turn. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 07:44, 17 March 2017
| Sidnell2012c | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Sidnell2012c |
| Author(s) | Jack Sidnell |
| Title | Turn-continuation by self and by other |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Turn Construction, Turncontinuation |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2012 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Processes |
| Volume | 49 |
| Number | 3-4 |
| Pages | 314–337 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/0163853X.2012.654760 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
At the possible completion of a turn constructional unit (TCU) that has not selected a next speaker, a speaker has two available options: either begin a new TCU or continue the one that has just come to a point of possible completion. This article describes some of the complex turns that result from exercising the second option. These can be seen to consist of at least two components: a host and a continuation. This article focuses, in particular, on cases in which these are produced by different speakers. Although a basic distinction between reverse- and same-directionality continuations can account for many instances, other cases are more complicated. This article suggests that such cases encourage us to consider the variety of footings a speaker can adopt vis-à-vis the prior talk by continuing another participant's turn.
Notes
