Difference between revisions of "Goffman1983"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2014-07-07 12:50:26) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| + | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| + | |Author(s)=Erving Goffman | ||
| + | |Title=Felicity's condition | ||
| + | |Tag(s)=Related Interaction Studies; | ||
|Key=Goffman1983 | |Key=Goffman1983 | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|Year=1983 | |Year=1983 | ||
|Journal=American Journal of Sociology | |Journal=American Journal of Sociology | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
|Pages=1–53 | |Pages=1–53 | ||
| + | |URL=https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/227833 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1086/227833 | ||
| + | |Abstract=In this paper an effort is made to review the relevance and limitations of a scattering of near-recent work in sociolinguistics, pragmatics, and conversational analysis with respect to a central issue in the sociological study of social interaction: the taken-for-granted and the inferences made therefrom. The hope is that the line between microsociological studies and sociolinguistics can be shown to be arbitrary, requiring those on each side of the division to address the concerns of those on the other side. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 08:41, 20 October 2019
| Goffman1983 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Goffman1983 |
| Author(s) | Erving Goffman |
| Title | Felicity's condition |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | Related Interaction Studies |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1983 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | American Journal of Sociology |
| Volume | 89 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 1–53 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1086/227833 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In this paper an effort is made to review the relevance and limitations of a scattering of near-recent work in sociolinguistics, pragmatics, and conversational analysis with respect to a central issue in the sociological study of social interaction: the taken-for-granted and the inferences made therefrom. The hope is that the line between microsociological studies and sociolinguistics can be shown to be arbitrary, requiring those on each side of the division to address the concerns of those on the other side.
Notes
