Difference between revisions of "Sakai-etal2014"
m (ShinichiroSakai moved page Mizukawa-etal2014 to Sakai-etal2014: Incorrect 1st author) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|Title=Envisioning the plan in interaction: Configuring pipes during a plumbers’ meeting | |Title=Envisioning the plan in interaction: Configuring pipes during a plumbers’ meeting | ||
|Editor(s)=Maurice Nevile; Pentti Haddington; Trine Heinemann; Mirka Rauniomaa | |Editor(s)=Maurice Nevile; Pentti Haddington; Trine Heinemann; Mirka Rauniomaa | ||
− | |Tag(s)= | + | |Tag(s)=Meeting talk; Ethnography; Ethnomethodology; Workplace |
|Key=Sakai-etal2014 | |Key=Sakai-etal2014 | ||
|Publisher=John Benjamins | |Publisher=John Benjamins | ||
|Year=2014 | |Year=2014 | ||
+ | |Language=English | ||
|Address=Amsterdam / Philadelphia | |Address=Amsterdam / Philadelphia | ||
− | |Booktitle=Interacting with | + | |Booktitle=Interacting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity |
− | |Pages= | + | |Pages=339–356 |
+ | |URL=https://benjamins.com/catalog/z.186.15sak | ||
+ | |DOI=10.1075/z.186.15sak | ||
|Abstract=The central focus of this chapter is the methods of practical reasoning that accomplish a mutual understanding of relevant objects during the organisation and operation of a plumbing design. To execute successfully the task of coor-dinating disparate actions in the work, participants must achieve a shared and collective vision of the particular objects under discussion. We emphasise that for objects to be used as interactional resources, they must first be made recog-nisable and intelligible as interactional accomplishments, though we also suggest that these two analytical issues are inseparable for members when developing a course of practical activity. Objects in our study include tangible artefacts that have physical materiality as well as not-yet-existing abstractions, the designs. | |Abstract=The central focus of this chapter is the methods of practical reasoning that accomplish a mutual understanding of relevant objects during the organisation and operation of a plumbing design. To execute successfully the task of coor-dinating disparate actions in the work, participants must achieve a shared and collective vision of the particular objects under discussion. We emphasise that for objects to be used as interactional resources, they must first be made recog-nisable and intelligible as interactional accomplishments, though we also suggest that these two analytical issues are inseparable for members when developing a course of practical activity. Objects in our study include tangible artefacts that have physical materiality as well as not-yet-existing abstractions, the designs. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 11:22, 7 December 2019
Sakai-etal2014 | |
---|---|
BibType | INCOLLECTION |
Key | Sakai-etal2014 |
Author(s) | Shinichiro Sakai, Ron Korenaga, Yoshifumi Mizukawa, Motoko Igarashi |
Title | Envisioning the plan in interaction: Configuring pipes during a plumbers’ meeting |
Editor(s) | Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann, Mirka Rauniomaa |
Tag(s) | Meeting talk, Ethnography, Ethnomethodology, Workplace |
Publisher | John Benjamins |
Year | 2014 |
Language | English |
City | Amsterdam / Philadelphia |
Month | |
Journal | |
Volume | |
Number | |
Pages | 339–356 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1075/z.186.15sak |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | Interacting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity |
Chapter |
Abstract
The central focus of this chapter is the methods of practical reasoning that accomplish a mutual understanding of relevant objects during the organisation and operation of a plumbing design. To execute successfully the task of coor-dinating disparate actions in the work, participants must achieve a shared and collective vision of the particular objects under discussion. We emphasise that for objects to be used as interactional resources, they must first be made recog-nisable and intelligible as interactional accomplishments, though we also suggest that these two analytical issues are inseparable for members when developing a course of practical activity. Objects in our study include tangible artefacts that have physical materiality as well as not-yet-existing abstractions, the designs.
Notes