Difference between revisions of "McCleary-Leite2013"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Leland Emerson McCleary; Tarcísio de Arantes Leite |Title=Turn-taking in Brazilian Sign Language: Evidence from overlap |Tag(s)=EMCA; T...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Leland Emerson McCleary; Tarcísio de Arantes Leite | |Author(s)=Leland Emerson McCleary; Tarcísio de Arantes Leite | ||
|Title=Turn-taking in Brazilian Sign Language: Evidence from overlap | |Title=Turn-taking in Brazilian Sign Language: Evidence from overlap | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Turn-taking; Sign Language; Brazil; Overlap; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Turn-taking; Sign Language; Brazil; Overlap; |
|Key=McCleary-Leite2013 | |Key=McCleary-Leite2013 | ||
|Year=2013 | |Year=2013 | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Volume=4 | |Volume=4 | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
| − | |Pages=123- | + | |Pages=123–154 |
| + | |URL=https://journals.equinoxpub.com/index.php/JIRCD/article/view/15841 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1558/jircd.v4i1.123 | ||
| + | |Abstract=This study investigates the interactional skills of fluent sign language users, with special attention to contexts of overlapping talk. Data from semi-spontaneous conversations were analyzed from the video record, transcribed in ELAN, with tiers for non-manual signals and with a ‘gesture phase’ analysis of manual signs. Results show that signers closely coordinate their contributions in accordance with the sequential implicativeness of gesture phases. They deploy conventional resources similar to those described for spoken languages to resolve overlap quickly and efficiently. We show that signers, like speakers of oral languages, orient to ‘one party talks at a time’, and that the management of talk-in-interaction is achieved within a tightly organized system which includes resources traditionally associated with the ‘linguistic’, ‘paralinguistic/prosodic’, and ‘kinetic/gestural’ domains, thus possibly contributing to investigations of explicitly ad hoc and multimodal forms of communication and eventually to a reevaluation of what might legitimately be termed ‘talk’. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 13:15, 1 March 2016
| McCleary-Leite2013 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | McCleary-Leite2013 |
| Author(s) | Leland Emerson McCleary, Tarcísio de Arantes Leite |
| Title | Turn-taking in Brazilian Sign Language: Evidence from overlap |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Turn-taking, Sign Language, Brazil, Overlap |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2013 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders |
| Volume | 4 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 123–154 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1558/jircd.v4i1.123 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This study investigates the interactional skills of fluent sign language users, with special attention to contexts of overlapping talk. Data from semi-spontaneous conversations were analyzed from the video record, transcribed in ELAN, with tiers for non-manual signals and with a ‘gesture phase’ analysis of manual signs. Results show that signers closely coordinate their contributions in accordance with the sequential implicativeness of gesture phases. They deploy conventional resources similar to those described for spoken languages to resolve overlap quickly and efficiently. We show that signers, like speakers of oral languages, orient to ‘one party talks at a time’, and that the management of talk-in-interaction is achieved within a tightly organized system which includes resources traditionally associated with the ‘linguistic’, ‘paralinguistic/prosodic’, and ‘kinetic/gestural’ domains, thus possibly contributing to investigations of explicitly ad hoc and multimodal forms of communication and eventually to a reevaluation of what might legitimately be termed ‘talk’.
Notes
